03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rural Water Supply Corruption in Ethiopia 155<br />

in oversight and sign-off procedures. Nonetheless, participants highlighted<br />

the need for a larger survey to strengthen the evidence base and<br />

the need for accurate (GPS) recording of borehole locations to ensure<br />

that inspection evidence can be linked with complete confidence to<br />

contract and invoicing documentation.<br />

Corruption evidence: Comparing contracts, construction, and invoices.<br />

Contracts for borehole drilling in Ethiopia typically specify the depth to<br />

which boreholes should be drilled, their diameter, the likely drilling conditions,<br />

and the casing material to be used. 21 Often the type of drilling rig<br />

is also specified (as previously discussed in the “Design, Tendering, and<br />

Procurement” subsection ). Typically, the responsibility for siting boreholes,<br />

supervising drilling operations, and authorizing payment for completed<br />

works rests with the regional water bureau.<br />

The subsections below look briefly at how contract specifications compare<br />

with what was actually built (based on evidence provided by CCTV<br />

footage) and what was finally invoiced by the driller and paid for by the<br />

commissioning agency. Box 4.6 summarizes overall variance (measured<br />

versus invoiced) in the sample, focusing on three cost-weighted indicators:<br />

borehole depth, diameter, and materials. In addition, we look at the<br />

relationship between construction variance (as above), community participation<br />

in water-point implementation, and community perceptions of<br />

construction quality.<br />

Variation between contracted specification and drilled depth. A borehole<br />

had been constructed at each of the locations the study team identified<br />

for inspection. For the 16 boreholes where an estimated depth<br />

had been specified in a contract, few (25 percent) were within 10<br />

percent of the target: most were both measured and invoiced for less<br />

depth.<br />

Given that measured depths, completion reports, and invoices for this<br />

group were consistent, the most likely reason for the discrepancy was that<br />

sufficient water was found at shallower depths and the supervisor suggested<br />

that drilling should cease before the target depth had been<br />

reached, saving time and money. This conclusion is supported by Carter<br />

et al. (2006), which found that reported completion depths in a survey<br />

of rural water supply boreholes across 14 zones in Ethiopia were often<br />

10–20 percent lower than in the design specification, largely because<br />

tenders erred on the side of caution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!