03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Justice Sector Corruption in Ethiopia 203<br />

Compared with other African countries, the numbers of judges<br />

(reportedly 2,739 in 2007 [NJI 2008]) and prosecutors (an estimated<br />

200 at the federal level, according to the director of criminal activities,<br />

surpassing the 118 federal judges; figures were not available for the<br />

regions) are relatively high. In fact, according to one estimate, there are<br />

considerably more judges than private lawyers (a less common but not<br />

unique situation in Africa) (Bourassa 2009).<br />

Police numbers per population remain low, as they do in the rest of<br />

Africa. Although all agencies have expansion plans, they face financial<br />

limitations and a lack of suitable recruits. In terms of work levels, expansion<br />

may not be necessary. Workloads for police may be heavy, but those<br />

for judges and prosecutors are moderately high but manageable. However,<br />

the government’s main interest appears to be increasing access and making<br />

all sector actors available to a greater range of the population.<br />

Productivity gains from modernization. This gradual expansion of the<br />

size and reach of the sector institutions is part of a modernization program<br />

that began in the middle of the last decade. Although the program<br />

theoretically incorporates all institutions, the judiciary has advanced more<br />

rapidly than the prosecution and the police, and in fact has introduced<br />

innovations seen in few developing countries. This is especially evident in<br />

its adoption of an automated CMS (fully installed at the federal level and<br />

partially installed in the regions) and its use to monitor productivity. As a<br />

result, the judiciaries have reduced delays substantially and increased<br />

output. A similar system was developed for the Ministry of Justice, but it<br />

has never been expanded beyond one pilot office in Addis Ababa, and<br />

even there it is said not to work.<br />

With data, systematic tracking. The courts (both federal and regional)<br />

track productivity, clearance, and congestion rates; appeals rates; execution<br />

of judgments; numbers of adjournment; and percentages of cases<br />

resolved within 0–30 days, 1–3 months, and so on up to more than six<br />

years. Since the installation of the system (in 2001), the numbers have all<br />

improved, although as shown below, congestion rates remain moderate.<br />

This is hardly surprising given the recent increases in filings.<br />

With the exception of South Africa, no African country has these kinds<br />

of statistical data, nor do they attempt to track efficiency so systematically.<br />

Moreover, although case management systems have been spreading<br />

since the early 1990s in other regions, a comparable emphasis on productivity<br />

is rare (<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 2004b). In some Latin American countries, a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!