03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

274 Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia<br />

• High design standard. Both the design standard of the road and the<br />

degree of quality control observed during an unannounced site visit<br />

exceeded what would normally have been expected under such<br />

circumstances in other countries.<br />

• Use of open tendering. Bidding contractors may not have known whether<br />

they were competing against 2 other contractors or 10. As a result, they<br />

may not have invested in a proper site visit when preparing their bids.<br />

This may have led them to assume worse site conditions than those<br />

that existed.<br />

• Unfair contract terms. The contract was described as assigning all risk to<br />

the contractor. As a result, bidding contractors would have made provision<br />

for all such risks in their prices.<br />

• Lack of confidence in procuring entity. RRAs have relatively little<br />

experience as procuring entities as well as a reputation for refusing to<br />

honor some written contract provisions. 13 Again, these factors may<br />

have caused bidding contractors to increase their rates.<br />

• Lack of experience in pricing bids. Some contractors in Ethiopia seem<br />

unaccustomed to pricing bids in the conventional manner, which entails<br />

building up projected unit rates for specified bill items. Instead, bids are<br />

apparently priced on the basis of rates used on previous contracts, irrespective<br />

of whether it may be possible to bid more competitively.<br />

In discussing unit costs with staff from the RRA responsible, it was<br />

clear that the authorities were both aware of and deeply concerned about<br />

what they perceive to be excessively high bid prices for rural roads. They<br />

referred to another road project on which the bid evaluation had been<br />

completed, but they had decided not to award the contract because value<br />

for money was not being achieved.<br />

The unit costs generally accepted by ERA for the nearest equivalent<br />

standard of unsealed federal road is understood to be approximately<br />

US$230,000 per kilometer. On this basis, the RRA gravel road cost of<br />

US$140,000 per kilometer appears more reasonable. However, international<br />

comparisons and comparisons with local costs built up from unit<br />

rates both suggest that road costs in Ethiopia are higher than would be<br />

expected in a truly competitive market.<br />

Infrastructure Unit Costs in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

Concerns about high and rising unit costs in the road sector are not<br />

unique to Ethiopia. A comprehensive 2008 study, drawing on data from<br />

24 countries including Ethiopia, looked specifically at the reasons for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!