03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

346 Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia<br />

a result, telecoms can be considered in general to be a moderately<br />

high-risk sector. However, the apparent mismatch between de jure and de<br />

facto processes and safeguards in the procurement of high-value telecoms<br />

equipment results in the supply of equipment being perceived to be the<br />

area of highest risk.<br />

The large sums involved render the overall perceived corruption risk<br />

in Ethiopia’s telecoms sector to be particularly high by international standards.<br />

By contrast, the low levels of petty corruption reported in the sector’s<br />

day-to-day interaction with the public results in that area of<br />

corruption risk being relatively low.<br />

To gain a better understanding of the nature of the major corruption<br />

risk identified, a more detailed analysis was undertaken of a particularly<br />

high-value, and controversial, contract for the supply of telecoms<br />

equipment. The next section describes this analysis.<br />

Procurement of Equipment Suppliers: The 2006 Vendor<br />

Financing and Supply Agreement<br />

The vendor financing contract entered into by the ETC in 2006 appears to<br />

be highly unusual. This section studies it to cast light on broader corruption<br />

risks related to the ETC’s procurement of equipment suppliers. This brief<br />

study should not be seen as an investigation or interpreted as alleging in<br />

itself that corruption has necessarily occurred. However, the circumstances<br />

as perceived both by stakeholders and by independent observers do raise<br />

serious questions about the control of corruption risks in this sector.<br />

The 2006 agreement is of high value and grants one supplier the right<br />

to supply all telecoms equipment to the ETC over a three-year period. In<br />

contrast with normal ETC practice, 15 no evidence is immediately apparent<br />

in this case that there was a commercial justification for the award of<br />

such a large contract to one supplier, that a competitive tender took place,<br />

or that there was an effective contractual mechanism for price protection<br />

and technical compliance. The following preliminary analysis seeks to<br />

understand this in more detail.<br />

In 2006, the ETC placed a contract with an international supplier to<br />

provide financing for, supply, and install telecoms equipment up to a<br />

value of US$1.5 billion. The agreement as signed provided for a 13-year<br />

loan period, with the first three years being interest-free. The ETC agreed,<br />

for a period of three years, to place all telecoms contracts with the<br />

supplier. Specifically, the agreement required the ETC to place nine prespecified<br />

equipment packages with the supplier.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!