03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140 Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia<br />

Box 4.2<br />

The Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Formula: Dividing<br />

Money Fairly among Regions<br />

A new formula for allocating the federal government’s “general purpose” grants<br />

to individual regions was introduced in 2007. The new formula has three basic<br />

principles, or objectives:<br />

• Ensure that all Ethiopians are entitled to a similar range and level of service<br />

delivery.<br />

• Make the transfer independent of regions’ tax efforts or expenditure levels<br />

(effort-neutral).<br />

• Ensure that regions that are forced to spend more than the “standard<br />

expenditure”—for example, because of their dispersed populations or<br />

entrenched poverty—are entitled to budgetary support.<br />

Variables included in the formula are population; differences in relative<br />

revenue-raising capacities; differences in relative expenditure needs (to meet<br />

basic needs, including water); and performance incentives. The approach strives<br />

for equal per capita distribution of grants while considering the regions’ needs or<br />

capacities.<br />

The formula has been the subject of intense negotiation. However, it has been<br />

agreed to and accepted by the regions and provides clear criteria for allocating<br />

funds.<br />

Source: <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 2009.<br />

off-treasury. Disbursement and reporting systems vary but are generally<br />

viewed as efficient and low-risk.<br />

A subject of considerable debate is the allocation of regional block<br />

grants (through Channel 1) to lower levels of government, in particular<br />

allocations for rural water supply. Ethiopia’s federal system gives regional<br />

states a high degree of autonomy over their public finances, and it is difficult<br />

to track levels of funding for different services—including rural<br />

water supply—at lower levels with precision (<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 2009). In practice,<br />

the discretion afforded to regions over the allocation of block grants<br />

is limited by existing commitments, capacity, and staffing levels. Public<br />

sector salaries set at the federal level absorb a major proportion of the<br />

grants: More established regions (Oromia, for example) tend to devolve

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!