03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Construction Sector Corruption in Ethiopia 251<br />

Table 6.2 (continued)<br />

• projects that are not responding to a prioritized need and (when combined with<br />

weak procurement regulations) can sometimes be negotiated directly between a<br />

corrupt official and a specific construction company;<br />

• adoption of inappropriately high construction standards to enhance contract values;<br />

• focus on constructing new infrastructure while neglecting to maintain existing facilities;<br />

• conflicts of interest for officials with a stake in the construction sector;<br />

• construction companies with party political allegiances; and<br />

• increasing unit costs when estimates are based on past output unit costs<br />

(which may have been influenced by corruption) rather than on future margins.<br />

Indicators of such risks as perceived in Ethiopia<br />

Specific<br />

General<br />

• Tendency toward top-down planning<br />

• Adoption of inappropriately high construction standards<br />

• Perceived conflict of interest for some officials<br />

• Party-related companies operating in the<br />

construction sector<br />

• Increasing unit costs<br />

• Delays in project execution<br />

• Lack of transparency<br />

Examples reported by stakeholders as having recently occurred in Ethiopia a<br />

• Packaging of contracts in a manner intended unfairly to favor some contractors over others<br />

• Lack of transparency in planning some design-build contracts and off-budget engineering,<br />

procurement, and construction contracts<br />

Underlying factors affecting this risk in Ethiopia<br />

Ethiopia has taken some decisive actions to address these risks, including (a) separating<br />

policy making and implementation functions in some parts of the sector; (b) defining<br />

appropriate technical standards; and (c) developing and publishing strict rules governing<br />

the roles of party-owned companies and party and government officials in the sector.<br />

But across the sector the overall picture remains patchy, with many perceived risks<br />

remaining. Such perceptions tend to be aggravated by an underlying tendency toward<br />

top-down planning and leadership styles. Specific concerns expressed relate to the risk of<br />

reduced competition arising from the dominance of Chinese firms on International<br />

Competitive Bidding (ICB) contracts, the proposed renewed use of tied Chinese aid in the<br />

transport sector, and an apparent distortion in some cases of the appraisal and prioritization<br />

procedures for proposed road investments overseen by some of the weaker RRAs.<br />

Corrective measures recommended by stakeholders in Ethiopia<br />

• Review of construction standards to identify areas at risk of overspecification or design<br />

• Requirement for all government and party officials to declare any commercial interests<br />

• Extension and more transparent application of proper project appraisal and ranking<br />

procedures for all construction sector investments<br />

• Encouragement of increased and fairer competition in the sector through strict<br />

enforcement of both the spirit and the letter of all relevant provisions of the Public<br />

Procurement Agency (PPA) regulations<br />

Source: Author’s compilation.<br />

a. Though accepted by other stakeholders as being plausible, these examples are neither backed by hard<br />

evidence nor necessarily widespread in the sector.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!