03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia<br />

sector. Central planning, control, and influence are evident in many<br />

aspects of the sector:<br />

• Access to some construction materials at preferential prices<br />

• Allocation of some specially imported equipment<br />

• Access to finance and to land<br />

• Registration and professional certification.<br />

Such controls can readily be understood in the context both of<br />

Ethiopia’s political history and of the scale of the development challenges<br />

it faces. But however well intentioned, the controls also bring<br />

with them the possibility of abuse. Whether or not such abuse occurs,<br />

government control and influence can generate a perception of<br />

unfairness or corruption. Such perceptions are reinforced by a lack of<br />

appreciation in some quarters that any market gives rise to losers as<br />

well as winners. Whether justified or not, this attitude can result in<br />

strong perceptions of corruption, which in turn may deter some potential<br />

bidders from competing. Such restrictions can have the effect of<br />

driving up prices.<br />

The detailed workings of such a process vary within the road sector.<br />

With federal roads, the government is known to have made considerable<br />

efforts to persuade non-Chinese contractors to reenter the market now<br />

that prices have reached attractive levels. The reluctance of some such<br />

contractors to do so may reflect a lingering perception that there is not a<br />

level playing field.<br />

With regional rural roads, a significant factor appears to be the<br />

unfair allocation of contractual risk, which has contributed to high unit<br />

costs. Several cases were reported of contractors being required to sign<br />

contracts that did, at face value, share risk fairly while being warned<br />

that in practice all risk lay with them. Other factors include weak<br />

institutional capacity, limited experience of competitive bidding, and<br />

untested procedures. All of these concerns are currently being addressed<br />

with the assistance of a European Union–funded capacity-building<br />

program.<br />

Government Efforts to Address Corruption Risks<br />

Ethiopian roads authority. As a leading, high-spending agency in the<br />

construction sector, ERA has a reputation for relatively strong professionalism<br />

in its approach to project planning, procurement, and management.<br />

In response to the perceived risk of possible collusion between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!