03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia<br />

Planning, Budgeting, and Transfers<br />

Grand corruption—the misuse of vast amounts of public sector funds by<br />

a relatively small number of officials—is most likely to occur during the<br />

planning and budgeting processes associated with project and sector<br />

investments. Corrupt practices along this portion of the value chain may<br />

include the following (Plummer and Cross 2007):<br />

• Favoring of large, capital-intensive works, where opportunities for bribery<br />

and rent seeking are greatest<br />

• Manipulation of budgets, particularly where there is a disconnect<br />

between policy objectives and planning and implementation<br />

• Corruption in local budget management (for example, fraud or falsification<br />

of accounts)<br />

• Corruption in fund allocation and transfers (for example, through<br />

approval systems that operate between ministries and line departments).<br />

Risk: low to medium. In poor countries, where the aid budget is a significant<br />

contributor of finance to the sector, the value chain is strongly<br />

influenced by the type of financing and conditions of use. A number of<br />

studies have highlighted the risk of corruption in donor-financed, poverty-focused<br />

projects—for example, where aid harmonization rather than<br />

spending efficiency becomes the key factor driving structural shifts in<br />

poverty reduction strategies. Indeed, the focus on budget support and<br />

alignment may provide a much greater degree of discretion, or fiduciary<br />

risk, in budget allocation and spending than traditional project-based<br />

investment.<br />

In Ethiopia, sector-level planning, budgeting, and financial transfers<br />

have changed significantly over recent years—reflecting shifts in both<br />

government policy (particularly around decentralization and revisions<br />

to the UAP) and donor financing. Such major changes might be<br />

expected to increase the risk of corruption in sector budgeting and<br />

transfers as new systems “bed in,” yet perceptions from Ethiopia indicate<br />

that corruption in these areas is viewed as generally low-risk, albeit with<br />

some variation among regions. Table 4.2 summarizes the findings of the<br />

study team and views of workshop participants about sector planning,<br />

budgeting, and fiscal transfer issues, highlighting moderate risk only in<br />

relation to local-level procurement and the use and abuse of monitoring<br />

information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!