26.01.2017 Views

Climate change impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016

document

document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> on environmental systems<br />

Box 4.6<br />

Soils under climate <strong>change</strong>: carbon storage <strong>and</strong> soil erosion<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> is one of the factors that determ<strong>in</strong>es soil formation <strong>and</strong> soil processes. Soil functions are equally critical <strong>in</strong> the soil<br />

system's resilience to climate <strong>change</strong> effects. Soils can offset other greenhouse gas emissions by captur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> stor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

carbon, <strong>and</strong> the soil's flood regulation function (ow<strong>in</strong>g to the structur<strong>in</strong>g effect of soil organic matter) can help <strong>in</strong> the<br />

adaptation to climate <strong>change</strong>. Furthermore, soils also help regulate temperature, as the water present <strong>in</strong> the soil has a<br />

cool<strong>in</strong>g effect. Soils are subject to a range of degradation processes, some of which are strongly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by climate<br />

<strong>change</strong>. For example, erosion by water <strong>and</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d are affected by extreme climate events (<strong>in</strong>tense ra<strong>in</strong>fall, droughts, heat<br />

waves, storms). In particular, erosion of the upper part of the soil (topsoil) leads to decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil organic carbon <strong>and</strong><br />

nutrient stocks, which <strong>in</strong>fluences fertility <strong>and</strong> has further knock-on effects. Soil organic matter loss leads to a breakdown<br />

of the soil structure <strong>and</strong> reduced soil water storage, which can lead to an enhanced risk of flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slides <strong>in</strong><br />

adjacent areas. Soil organic matter can be a strong <strong>in</strong>dicator of soil biodiversity, which plays a crucial role <strong>in</strong> carbon <strong>and</strong><br />

nutrient cycl<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, both soil organic matter <strong>and</strong> soil organism diversity <strong>and</strong> activity are affected by temperature<br />

<strong>and</strong> moisture <strong>change</strong>s. The <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>kages between the climate <strong>and</strong> soil system, along with the <strong>in</strong>teraction between humans<br />

<strong>and</strong> these natural systems, def<strong>in</strong>e the degree to which soil can deliver services to society. L<strong>and</strong> use <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> management<br />

(supported by conducive policies) responsive to the challenges of climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> its impact are thus crucial for the<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g services.<br />

Soil organic carbon<br />

Estimates derived from the <strong>Europe</strong>an Soil Database <strong>in</strong>dicate that around 45 % of the m<strong>in</strong>eral soils <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> have a topsoil<br />

organic carbon content that is very low to low (0–2 %) <strong>and</strong> 45 % have a medium content (2–6 %) (Rusco et al., 2001). Soil<br />

organic carbon (SOC) stocks <strong>in</strong> the EU-27 were estimated at 73–79 billion tonnes us<strong>in</strong>g the Topsoil Organic Carbon Content<br />

for <strong>Europe</strong> (OCTOP) model (Jones et al., 2005, 2012). Comparisons of this modelled data with alternative approaches<br />

suggest that the SOC stock may have been both underestimated <strong>and</strong> overestimated. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, Baritz et al. (2014)<br />

suggest that the OCTPOP model has underestimated SOC (e.g. <strong>in</strong> Norway). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, estimates for north-eastern<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>, compris<strong>in</strong>g countries with a high proportion of organic topsoils, are presumably overestimated (country data,<br />

Panagos et al., 2013; GEMAS ( 58 ) dataset, Baritz et al., 2014). Modell<strong>in</strong>g results from the CAPRESE ( 59 ) project show a topsoil<br />

(0–30 cm) SOC pool of 17.6 billion tonnes (or Gt) ( 60 ) <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils at pan-<strong>Europe</strong>an level ( 61 ) (17.0 Gt for the EU-28)<br />

(Lugato, Panagos et al., 2014). These data suggest that the OCTOP assessment may have overestimated the SOC pool <strong>in</strong><br />

agricultural soils by around 24 %. Values for forest SOC stocks <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> (on a reference forest area of 163 million hectares<br />

(ha)) were estimated at 3.50–3.94 Gt <strong>in</strong> forest floors (organic sub-layers), <strong>and</strong> 11.4–12.2 Gt (0–30 cm) or 21.4–22.5 Gt (upper<br />

1 m) <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>and</strong> peat soils (De Vos et al., 2015). These new data po<strong>in</strong>t at an underestimation of most exist<strong>in</strong>g estimates<br />

for <strong>Europe</strong>an forest soils, <strong>and</strong> highlight that a substantial amount of SOC is stored <strong>in</strong> forest floors.<br />

A recent assessment (us<strong>in</strong>g the LUCAS ( 62 ) database along with SOC predictors) shows that predicted SOC contents are<br />

lowest <strong>in</strong> Mediterranean countries <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> cropl<strong>and</strong>s across <strong>Europe</strong>, whereas the largest predicted SOC contents are <strong>in</strong><br />

wetl<strong>and</strong>s, woodl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>ous areas (de Brogniez et al., 2015). This is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the notion that cropl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

generally act as a carbon source, while forest soils generally provide a s<strong>in</strong>k (Schils et al., 2008). Nevertheless, some cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices can lead to sequestration <strong>in</strong> arable soils if given time (see below), while CH 4 emissions from livestock <strong>and</strong> N 2 O<br />

emissions from arable agriculture may be fully compensated by the CO 2 s<strong>in</strong>k provided by forests <strong>and</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong>s (Schulze<br />

et al., 2009).<br />

Possible pathways for SOC <strong>and</strong> CO 2 development <strong>in</strong> temperate m<strong>in</strong>eral soils <strong>in</strong>volve many possible <strong>in</strong>terrelationships,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g the effects of climate <strong>change</strong> on SOC stocks <strong>and</strong> greenhouse gas emissions complex (EEA, 2012). The organic carbon<br />

pool of soils (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g deeper layers) <strong>in</strong> the northern permafrost region is estimated to account for approximately 50 % of<br />

the estimated global belowground organic carbon pool (Tarnocai et al., 2009). There, higher temperatures could <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the activity of microbial decomposers <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>directly affect organic matter decomposition through other feedbacks, of which<br />

thaw<strong>in</strong>g of permafrost (cover<strong>in</strong>g about 50 % of the boreal zone) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased fire frequency are expected to create the<br />

strongest effects (positive <strong>and</strong> negative, respectively) on microbial CO 2 production (Allison <strong>and</strong> Treseder, 2011).<br />

( 58 ) GEMAS: 'Geochemical Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Graz<strong>in</strong>g L<strong>and</strong> Soil'.<br />

( 59 ) CAPRESE: 'CArbon PREservation <strong>and</strong> SEquestration <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils: Options <strong>and</strong> implications for agricultural production'.<br />

( 60 ) Allocated as 7.6 <strong>and</strong> 5.5 Gt <strong>in</strong> arable <strong>and</strong> pasture l<strong>and</strong>s, respectively.<br />

( 61 ) EU-28 + Serbia, Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a, Montenegro, Albania, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia <strong>and</strong> Norway.<br />

( 62 ) LUCAS: 'L<strong>and</strong> Use/Cover Area frame Statistical Survey'.<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>2016</strong> | An <strong>in</strong>dicator-based report<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!