Climate change impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016
document
document
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> on society<br />
conditions (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g expected climatic <strong>change</strong>) <strong>and</strong><br />
also <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong>creased global transfer of nutrients,<br />
which can have potentially damag<strong>in</strong>g consequences<br />
for feed-produc<strong>in</strong>g countries (soil impoverishment <strong>and</strong><br />
erosion) <strong>and</strong> feed-import<strong>in</strong>g countries (pollution <strong>and</strong><br />
eutrophication of natural water courses) (Leip et al.,<br />
2015). At the same time as (<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with) these<br />
<strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> production, consumers are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
putt<strong>in</strong>g pressure on producers to produce more <strong>in</strong> a<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able manner (Broom et al., 2013).<br />
Alongside the economic <strong>change</strong>s described above,<br />
climate <strong>change</strong> is already hav<strong>in</strong>g an impact on livestock<br />
production systems. In northern countries, the length<br />
of the grow<strong>in</strong>g season is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g, lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>change</strong>s<br />
<strong>in</strong> graz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g regimes <strong>in</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong>-based<br />
systems (Högl<strong>in</strong>d et al., 2013). These <strong>change</strong>s can<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g about management challenges, such as those<br />
described <strong>in</strong> the North Savo region of F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>, where<br />
one of the challenges is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g wet conditions<br />
that, coupled with use of heavier mach<strong>in</strong>ery, lead to<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g soil compaction <strong>and</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil fertility<br />
(Box 5.1). <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> is also beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to have an<br />
impact on animal health. The number of days <strong>in</strong> which<br />
the temperature–humidity <strong>in</strong>dex exceeds the critical<br />
maximum threshold is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> many parts of<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> (Gauly et al., 2013; Dunn et al., 2014). Exposure<br />
to a high temperature–humidity <strong>in</strong>dex can effect milk<br />
production <strong>and</strong> quality, mortality, reproductive health<br />
<strong>and</strong> disease susceptibility, especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive dairy<br />
cattle (Vitali et al., 2009). Some livestock pathogens <strong>and</strong><br />
pathogen vectors appear to be exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g their ranges<br />
<strong>and</strong> abundance as a result of climate <strong>change</strong>, such<br />
as the spread of bluetongue <strong>in</strong> northern <strong>Europe</strong>. For<br />
other pathogens, climate <strong>change</strong> is only one of a range<br />
of variables affect<strong>in</strong>g their occurrence, <strong>and</strong> may not<br />
always have a negative effect (Perry et al., 2013).<br />
All these <strong>change</strong>s take place <strong>in</strong> the context of a<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g policy l<strong>and</strong>scape. Support for agriculture<br />
under the EU CAP is be<strong>in</strong>g de-coupled from production.<br />
Furthermore, under the second pillar of the EU CAP,<br />
there is support for improv<strong>in</strong>g the way that livestock<br />
systems conserve <strong>and</strong> enhance the provision of societal<br />
goods, such as biodiversity <strong>and</strong> ecosystem services,<br />
which are often undervalued by the market.<br />
Projections<br />
So far, the modell<strong>in</strong>g of future <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> livestock<br />
production under climate <strong>change</strong> at the <strong>Europe</strong>an scale<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes only <strong>in</strong>direct <strong>impacts</strong> on livestock systems, via<br />
<strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> crop production <strong>and</strong> prices. Most of these<br />
studies have shown that climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> are<br />
less important than socio-economic factors <strong>in</strong> affect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
livestock production <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> (Audsley et al., 2006;<br />
Leclère et al., 2013). As <strong>in</strong>creased CO 2 <strong>and</strong> warmer<br />
conditions lead to <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the productivity of<br />
crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>, livestock systems are expected to rely<br />
more on high-prote<strong>in</strong> feeds <strong>and</strong> less on grassl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
Such trends are also driven by climate <strong>change</strong>, namely<br />
reductions <strong>in</strong> global crop yields <strong>and</strong> the subsequent<br />
price <strong>in</strong>creases (Frank et al., 2014). Increases <strong>in</strong> crop<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> may be driven more by biofuel production <strong>and</strong><br />
animal feed than by human consumption.<br />
The modell<strong>in</strong>g predictions described above do not<br />
take account of <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong> productivity<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g from climate-<strong>change</strong> related conditions,<br />
although it has been suggested that this might only be<br />
a marg<strong>in</strong>al factor (Leclère et al., 2013). A model-based<br />
study estimated a 3 % <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> annual grassl<strong>and</strong><br />
production between 1961 <strong>and</strong> 2010, but the model<br />
used does not yet consider <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> forage quality<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g from climate <strong>change</strong> (Chang et al., 2015).<br />
Livestock systems are potentially affected by a much<br />
wider range of variables, beyond those affect<strong>in</strong>g feed<br />
sources. These <strong>in</strong>clude (1) the species <strong>and</strong> genetic<br />
characteristics of the livestock be<strong>in</strong>g farmed, (2) the<br />
health <strong>and</strong> welfare status of animals, (3) management<br />
at <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> herd levels (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g health<br />
<strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>and</strong> diet choices) <strong>and</strong> (4) longer term<br />
strategic decisions about the type of farm<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
<strong>and</strong> its adaptation to local conditions. Such choices<br />
are mediated by socio-economic factors work<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
multiple <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g scales, <strong>and</strong> from with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
beyond <strong>Europe</strong>. There have been early attempts to<br />
model the <strong>impacts</strong> of heat stress on dairy cattle <strong>in</strong> a<br />
regional study of Austrian livestock production under<br />
climate <strong>change</strong>, but models cannot yet capture the<br />
variety of climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved (Schönhart<br />
<strong>and</strong> Nadeem, 2015). As a result, there is much<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about the response of livestock production<br />
to climate <strong>change</strong>.<br />
Table 5.4 demonstrates that climate <strong>change</strong> presents<br />
very different challenges depend<strong>in</strong>g on whether it is<br />
assumed that there is a cont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>in</strong> the production<br />
trends considered above (where producers 'push'<br />
for the <strong>in</strong>tensification of livestock systems under<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued globalisation, <strong>and</strong> with a switch <strong>in</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use<br />
towards cropl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the ab<strong>and</strong>onment of marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
graz<strong>in</strong>g) or if a 'pull' model is considered, with grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
consumer dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> policy support for production<br />
based on a wider def<strong>in</strong>ition of susta<strong>in</strong>ability (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
biodiversity <strong>and</strong> ecosystem services) (B<strong>in</strong>di <strong>and</strong> Olesen,<br />
2011; Broom et al., 2013).<br />
Different societal choices (social, political <strong>and</strong><br />
economic) are likely to create systems that may face<br />
very different challenges under climate <strong>change</strong>. While<br />
the 'push' model of livestock production systems may<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to drive <strong>in</strong>tensification <strong>in</strong> some sectors <strong>and</strong><br />
regions, others might be 'pulled' <strong>in</strong> other directions by<br />
<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>2016</strong> | An <strong>in</strong>dicator-based report<br />
241