26.01.2017 Views

Climate change impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016

document

document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Policy context<br />

<strong>and</strong> climate <strong>change</strong> concerns by reward<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of practices that are beneficial for<br />

the environment <strong>and</strong> climate, by sett<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

targets for measures concern<strong>in</strong>g environment <strong>and</strong><br />

climate-related <strong>in</strong>vestments, <strong>and</strong> by promot<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Member States' action towards the preservation<br />

of ecosystems <strong>and</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g a climate-resilient<br />

economy. Adaptations to the implementation<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or design of the CAP might occur as a follow-up<br />

to the mid-term report on implementation foreseen<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2017.<br />

2.4 Adaptation at country level<br />

This section provides a brief overview of adaptation<br />

actions undertaken at the level of <strong>in</strong>dividual EU Member<br />

States. It is based on the 2014 EEA report on national<br />

adaptation processes (EEA, 2014), report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2015 by<br />

all 28 Member States under Article 15 of the Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Mechanism Regulation, <strong>and</strong> the sixth UNFCCC National<br />

Communications of the EU Member States.<br />

National adaptation strategies <strong>and</strong> plans, <strong>and</strong><br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g, report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> evaluation<br />

To date, 23 <strong>Europe</strong>an countries (20 EU Member<br />

States <strong>and</strong> three further EEA member countries) have<br />

adopted a national adaptation strategy (NAS) <strong>and</strong> 12<br />

have developed a national adaptation plan (NAP) (see<br />

Map 2.1). More than half of <strong>Europe</strong>an countries have<br />

made progress <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g adaptation<br />

options.<br />

Adaptation is most often implemented by apply<strong>in</strong>g 'soft'<br />

measures (e.g. provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation or ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

The water, agriculture <strong>and</strong> forestry sectors are reported<br />

to be the most advanced <strong>in</strong> terms of implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />

portfolios of adaptation measures at all adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

levels.<br />

An <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of <strong>Europe</strong>an countries are now<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g action on monitor<strong>in</strong>g, report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> evaluation<br />

(MRE) of adaptation at national level (EEA, 2015a). So<br />

far, 14 countries have systems for monitor<strong>in</strong>g, report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or evaluation of adaptation <strong>in</strong> place or under<br />

development (see Map 2.1). Most countries have so<br />

far focused on monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g activities. The<br />

evaluation of adaptation policies is often at an early<br />

stage because the implementation of adaptation has<br />

only just begun.<br />

Across <strong>Europe</strong>an countries, progress on adaptation<br />

strategies <strong>and</strong> plans varies considerably <strong>and</strong> the same<br />

is true for MRE of adaptation. Despite these differences,<br />

early <strong>in</strong>sights from this dynamic field of practice can<br />

be valuable to countries with established approaches,<br />

as well as to those just beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to consider MRE<br />

of adaptation. These experiences contribute to an<br />

essential <strong>in</strong>formation base for countries to learn from.<br />

Success factors for <strong>and</strong> barriers to adaptation <strong>and</strong><br />

knowledge gaps<br />

Progress <strong>in</strong> adaptation depends on a number of<br />

success factors <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>terconnection. For example,<br />

effective coord<strong>in</strong>ation among authorities supports the<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement of a wide range of stakeholders by ensur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the availability of consistent <strong>and</strong> reliable <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> by ensur<strong>in</strong>g clarity with respect to roles <strong>and</strong><br />

responsibilities.<br />

Barriers to adaptation are not simply the <strong>in</strong>verse of<br />

success factors. A lack of resources (e.g. time, money<br />

<strong>and</strong> equipment) <strong>and</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties are viewed by<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>an countries as the most important barriers.<br />

Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties are a common feature across all levels of<br />

advancement <strong>in</strong> policymak<strong>in</strong>g. Policymak<strong>in</strong>g can benefit<br />

from embedd<strong>in</strong>g processes that focus on learn<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

experiences, review<strong>in</strong>g progress <strong>and</strong> policy objectives,<br />

<strong>and</strong> encourag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative experimentation.<br />

To further support adaptation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an countries,<br />

more <strong>in</strong>formation is needed on the costs <strong>and</strong> benefits<br />

of adaptation, as well as on the risks <strong>and</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties,<br />

vulnerabilities at local level, <strong>and</strong> the availability of data<br />

for monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> evaluation purposes (see also<br />

Chapter 7).<br />

Transnational cooperation<br />

Transnational cooperation <strong>in</strong> adaptation to climate<br />

<strong>change</strong> has <strong>in</strong>creased with the recognition of the<br />

importance of adaptation as a cross-cutt<strong>in</strong>g policy<br />

area. Half of <strong>Europe</strong>an countries report consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transnational cooperation <strong>in</strong> national adaptation policy<br />

processes. Transnational cooperation <strong>in</strong> adaptation has<br />

often been developed with the support of <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struments, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the context of established<br />

cooperation forums such as <strong>Europe</strong>an regional<br />

conventions.<br />

Water management is an area that has a broad<br />

experience of transnational cooperation <strong>in</strong> the EU, <strong>and</strong><br />

was the first area <strong>in</strong> which adaptation to climate <strong>change</strong><br />

was considered, e.g. transboundary river bas<strong>in</strong>s or<br />

catchment management. Coastal area management is<br />

another common sector for transnational cooperation<br />

<strong>and</strong> where adaptation to climate <strong>change</strong> has been<br />

recognised as a transboundary issue, as well as<br />

biodiversity conservation <strong>and</strong> strategies, <strong>and</strong> risk<br />

management protocols for natural hazards.<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>2016</strong> | An <strong>in</strong>dicator-based report<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!