26.01.2017 Views

Climate change impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016

document

document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Multi-sectoral <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>and</strong> risks<br />

Table 6.4<br />

Overview of cost estimates of projected climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />

Thematic area<br />

(<strong>and</strong> section <strong>in</strong><br />

this report)<br />

Coastal zones<br />

(see also<br />

Section 4.2)<br />

River flood<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(see also<br />

Section 4.3)<br />

Agriculture<br />

(see also<br />

Section 5.3)<br />

Energy<br />

(see also<br />

Section 5.4)<br />

Transport<br />

(see also<br />

Section 5.5)<br />

Tourism<br />

(see also<br />

Section 5.6)<br />

Pan-<strong>Europe</strong>an estimates<br />

Recent estimates of costs to coastal zones are EUR 6 to 19 billion per year for RCP2.6, EUR 7 to 27 billion<br />

per year for RCP4.5 <strong>and</strong> EUR 15 to 65 billion per year for RCP8.5 <strong>in</strong> the 2060s <strong>in</strong> the EU (no adaptation,<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed climate <strong>and</strong> socio-economic <strong>change</strong> (SSP2), current prices, no discount<strong>in</strong>g, with the range<br />

reflect<strong>in</strong>g the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty around sea level rise), based on the DIVA model ( 119 ) <strong>in</strong> IMPACT2C (Brown et al.,<br />

2015). These costs rise rapidly <strong>in</strong> later years, rang<strong>in</strong>g from EUR 18 to 111 billion per year for RCP2.6,<br />

EUR 40 to 249 billion per year for RCP4.5 <strong>and</strong> EUR 153 to 631 billion per year for RCP8.5 <strong>in</strong> the 2080s<br />

(Brown et al., 2015). This <strong>in</strong>dicates a disproportionate <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> costs for greater warm<strong>in</strong>g scenarios <strong>in</strong><br />

the second half of the century. There are major differences between Member States, with the greatest<br />

coastal zone costs projected to occur <strong>in</strong> France, the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s if no additional<br />

adaptation occurs<br />

The expected annual damage is estimated to rise from approximately EUR 4–5 billion/year (currently) to<br />

EUR 32 billion/year <strong>in</strong> the EU by the middle of the century (RCP4.5 for 2 °C of warm<strong>in</strong>g) without additional<br />

adaptation (median ensemble results, comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects of socio-economic <strong>and</strong> climate <strong>change</strong>, current<br />

values, undiscounted), based on the LISFLOOD model ( 120 ) from IMPACT2C (Roudier et al., <strong>2016</strong>). The<br />

large range of this estimate is a result of the high levels of climate model uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. Note that around<br />

half of the <strong>in</strong>crease reported is attributable to climate <strong>change</strong>. Analysis at the country level reports high<br />

climate-related costs <strong>in</strong> France, Germany, Italy, Romania, <strong>and</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>and</strong> damage costs rise<br />

significantly <strong>in</strong> the subsequent years. While there are <strong>Europe</strong>-wide assessments of stream-flow drought,<br />

soil moisture drought <strong>and</strong> water scarcity (IMPACT2C project, 2015), these have not been monetised<br />

The recent Agricultural Model Inter-comparison <strong>and</strong> Improvement Project (AGMIP) <strong>in</strong>dicates that climate<br />

<strong>change</strong> could lead to a 20 % (mean) food price rise by 2050 globally, with a large range from 0 to 60 %<br />

(common reference climate <strong>and</strong> socio-economic scenario) (Nelson et al., 2014). Yield losses <strong>and</strong> price<br />

<strong>impacts</strong> rise more sharply <strong>in</strong> later years under greater warm<strong>in</strong>g scenarios. These results cover only<br />

a limited number of crops <strong>and</strong> <strong>impacts</strong>, <strong>and</strong> exclude horticulture, livestock <strong>and</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> on the wider<br />

multi-functionality of agriculture. Values vary widely with scenarios <strong>and</strong> assumptions (on <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

autonomous farm adaptation <strong>and</strong> trade)<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will have negative <strong>and</strong> positive effects on future energy dem<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g summer<br />

cool<strong>in</strong>g but reduc<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter heat<strong>in</strong>g (an autonomous response). Additional cool<strong>in</strong>g costs have been<br />

estimated at around EUR 30 billion/year <strong>in</strong> the EU-27 by 2050, ris<strong>in</strong>g to EUR 109 billion/year by 2100<br />

(A1B, climate <strong>change</strong> signal only, current values, undiscounted), based on the <strong>Climate</strong>Cost study us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the POLES model (Mima et al., 2011; Mima <strong>and</strong> Criqui, 2015). However, a similar level of economic benefit<br />

was projected as a result of the reduction <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter heat<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> ow<strong>in</strong>g to warmer temperatures,<br />

although with the benefits aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> different countries. Under the E1 scenario, the total costs of<br />

the cool<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> due to climate <strong>change</strong> (alone) were much lower, estimated at approximately<br />

EUR 20 billion/year over the period 2050–2100). <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will also have effects on energy supply,<br />

notably on hydroelectric generation, but also potentially on thermal power (nuclear, fossil) plants <strong>and</strong><br />

some renewables; these <strong>in</strong>volve additional costs (Mima et al., 2011), although these are low relative to the<br />

<strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> outl<strong>in</strong>ed above<br />

The PESETA II study (Ciscar et al., 2014) considered <strong>impacts</strong> on the road <strong>and</strong> rail networks, estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the total damages to transport <strong>in</strong>frastructure due to extreme precipitation to be EUR 930 million/year by<br />

the end of the century under an A1B scenario (a ~ 50 % <strong>in</strong>crease from the current basel<strong>in</strong>e damages of<br />

EUR 629 million/year) <strong>and</strong> EUR 770 million/year under a 2 °C warm<strong>in</strong>g scenario. More specific estimates<br />

also exist for road transport. The future costs are driven by future socio-economic assumptions, i.e. on<br />

transport patterns <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>. Further <strong>in</strong>formation is available from the WEATHER project (Przyluski<br />

et al., 2011) <strong>and</strong> the EWENT project (Nokkala et al., 2012)<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> is projected to make regions less favourable for tourism <strong>in</strong> the south <strong>in</strong> summer but<br />

more favourable <strong>in</strong> the north. Several recent studies have used econometric approaches <strong>and</strong> economic<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g approaches to identify the economic <strong>impacts</strong> of climate <strong>change</strong> on tourism under different<br />

assumptions for adaptation (Barrios et al., 2013; Ciscar et al., 2014; Rosselló-Nadal, 2014; Perrels et al.,<br />

2015). As an example, the PESETA II study (Ciscar et al., 2014) used an econometric analysis, report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

estimated costs of EUR 15 billion/year by the end of the century, driven by reductions <strong>in</strong> southern <strong>Europe</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the southern parts of central <strong>Europe</strong>, <strong>and</strong> with particular ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the northern parts of central<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>. However, other studies report more positive results, not<strong>in</strong>g that the economic <strong>impacts</strong> depend<br />

on whether tourists adapt by chang<strong>in</strong>g their dest<strong>in</strong>ation or the tim<strong>in</strong>g of their travel. <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will<br />

also affect w<strong>in</strong>ter tourism, as snow reliability will decrease <strong>in</strong> the mounta<strong>in</strong>ous regions, particularly the<br />

Alps, putt<strong>in</strong>g the ski resorts that are at lower altitudes at risk, lead<strong>in</strong>g to adaptation costs (artificial snow)<br />

or <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> dest<strong>in</strong>ation choices or tim<strong>in</strong>g (Perrels et al., 2015). Estimates are heavily <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />

assumptions about <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> global tourism <strong>and</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>g global growth <strong>in</strong> tourism, as well as the<br />

autonomous adaptation response of tourists<br />

( 119 ) Dynamic Interactive Vulnerability Assessment model (http://www.diva-model.net).<br />

( 120 ) https://www.efas.eu/user-<strong>in</strong>formation.html.<br />

284 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>2016</strong> | An <strong>in</strong>dicator-based report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!