26.01.2017 Views

Climate change impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016

document

document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Multi-sectoral <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>and</strong> risks<br />

Table 6.4<br />

Overview of cost estimates of projected climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> (cont.)<br />

Thematic area<br />

(<strong>and</strong> section <strong>in</strong><br />

this report)<br />

Human health<br />

(see also<br />

Section 5.2)<br />

Biodiversity<br />

<strong>and</strong> ecosystem<br />

services<br />

(see also<br />

Section 4.4 <strong>and</strong><br />

Section 4.5)<br />

Pan-<strong>Europe</strong>an estimates<br />

The costs of heat-related mortality, without adaptation, are estimated to be EUR 11 to 41 billion/year<br />

by the middle of the century (mean ensemble estimates for RCP4.5 at 2 °C, climate <strong>and</strong> socio-economic<br />

impact, with range reflect<strong>in</strong>g different approaches for valuation, no current or future adaptation,<br />

current prices, undiscounted), with around two-thirds of the <strong>in</strong>crease due to the climate signal alone<br />

(this is based on the IMPACT2C project, with <strong>impacts</strong> estimated by the WHO <strong>and</strong> valuation undertaken<br />

by Lacressonnière et al. (2015)). Values vary widely accord<strong>in</strong>g to whether current adaptation <strong>and</strong> future<br />

acclimatisation are <strong>in</strong>cluded or not, <strong>and</strong> the metric <strong>and</strong> value used for mortality valuation. The highest<br />

<strong>impacts</strong> were found <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean (Cyprus, Greece <strong>and</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>) <strong>and</strong> some eastern EU Member<br />

States (Bulgaria, Hungary <strong>and</strong> Romania). Costs rose strongly <strong>in</strong> later years with greater warm<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

analysis did not consider the potential reduction <strong>in</strong> cold-related mortality. Additional <strong>impacts</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

food‐borne disease, extreme events (deaths <strong>and</strong> reduced well-be<strong>in</strong>g as a result of coastal flood<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>and</strong><br />

occupational health (outdoor labour productivity), were valued <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Climate</strong>Cost project (Kovats et al.,<br />

2011), although the economic costs were low when compared with the heat-related mortality <strong>impacts</strong><br />

outl<strong>in</strong>ed above<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> poses a potentially wide variety of risks to terrestrial, aquatic <strong>and</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e biodiversity <strong>and</strong><br />

the ecosystem services they provide (provision<strong>in</strong>g, regulat<strong>in</strong>g, cultural <strong>and</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g services). However,<br />

the valuation of the effects of climate <strong>change</strong> on biodiversity <strong>and</strong> ecosystem services is extremely<br />

complex. While a number of studies have undertaken case studies, this rema<strong>in</strong>s an under-explored area,<br />

although there is some analysis of ecosystem shifts under climate <strong>change</strong>, which use restoration costs to<br />

assess <strong>impacts</strong><br />

Figure 6.3<br />

Welfare <strong>impacts</strong> of climate <strong>change</strong> for different EU regions <strong>and</strong> sectors for two emissions<br />

scenarios<br />

Percentage of GDP, 2005 EUR value, undiscounted<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

– 0.50<br />

– 1.00<br />

– 1.50<br />

– 2.00<br />

– 2.50<br />

– 3.00<br />

– 3.50<br />

Ref. 2 °C<br />

Ref. 2 °C<br />

Ref. 2 °C<br />

Ref. 2 °C<br />

Ref. 2 °C<br />

Ref. 2 °C<br />

Northern<br />

<strong>Europe</strong><br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

<strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

Central <strong>Europe</strong>,<br />

north<br />

Central <strong>Europe</strong>,<br />

south<br />

Southern<br />

<strong>Europe</strong><br />

EU<br />

Coastal Energy Agriculture Forest fire River flood Tourism Transport Health<br />

Note:<br />

The figure shows the projected welfare <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>in</strong> the period 2071–2100, compared with 2010. 'Ref.' refers to the SRES A1B emissions<br />

scenario; '2 °C' refers to the ENSEMBLES E1 emissions scenario.<br />

Source: Adapted from Ciscar et al., 2014.<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>2016</strong> | An <strong>in</strong>dicator-based report<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!