29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.3 shows that the SOC score <strong>of</strong> all participants increase from pre-test to post-<br />

test, and that follow-up scores <strong>of</strong> all participants are also higher than their pre-test<br />

scores.<br />

Fig. 5.8 shows the scores <strong>of</strong> the six participants and the mean at pre-test, post-test and<br />

follow-up in a graphic format, while fig. 5.10-5.12 shows the scores as distributed in<br />

the three subscales: Meaningfulness, Manageability, and Comprehensibility.<br />

Figure 5. 8 SOC: Pre-test, post-test and follow-up scores <strong>of</strong> 6 participants + mean<br />

score.<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

SOC/AOS (Antonovsky)<br />

WIFU INLA PIJØ ESMA SAAA ANHO Mean<br />

Pre<br />

Post<br />

Follow-up<br />

Fig. 5.8 shows that the scores <strong>of</strong> all six participants increased from pre-test to post-<br />

test, three <strong>of</strong> them (WIFU, ESMA, ANHO) markedly, the other three (INLA, PIJØ,<br />

SAAA) only marginally. In other words, the participants fall into two groups, one<br />

with a high increase from pre-test to post-test, and one, which is stable. From post-test<br />

to follow up there is a further increase in the score <strong>of</strong> one participant (WIFU) while<br />

the scores <strong>of</strong> the other five participants decrease, however, all follow-up scores are<br />

higher than pre-test scores. The differences are expressed by the standard deviations:<br />

20.8 at pre-test, 17.4 at post-test and 23.2 at follow-up. The pre-test-scores <strong>of</strong> INLA,<br />

PIJØ and ESMA were close to average, while ANHOs were low, SAAAs and WIFU<br />

high, as compared to healthy reference groups, as shown in fig. 5.9.<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!