29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 8. 1 Nattiez' Tripartition Model<br />

semiological tripartition<br />

Poietic process (creation) Esthesic process (re-creation)<br />

"Producer" Trace “Receiver”<br />

Poietic analysis Esthesic analysis<br />

Nattiez operates with 6 analytical situations:<br />

I. Immanent analysis: the neutral ground, the trace<br />

II. Inductive poietics: internal observations <strong>of</strong> musical procedures<br />

III. External poietics: external documents are used to highlight procedures<br />

IV. Inductive esthesis: perceptive introspection, researcher as listener<br />

V. External esthesis: information on other listeners’ perception<br />

VI. A final complex synthesis.<br />

Aldridge (1996. p. 163-172) introduced a distinction between three levels <strong>of</strong><br />

constitutive rules and one level <strong>of</strong> regulative rules:<br />

• Level 1 (preceding Nattiez’ analytical situations) is the sound, the performance<br />

and the experience itself.<br />

• Level 2 (corresponding to Nattiez’ situations I-III) is the descriptive level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

‘trace (e.g. an audio or video recording <strong>of</strong> an improvisation or a music-listening<br />

period <strong>of</strong> a BMGIM session, and our dialogue on, or indexing <strong>of</strong> the music. It is<br />

no longer the experience itself, but our language-bound description <strong>of</strong> it, meant for<br />

verification and lexical labelling: what happened in the music and in the<br />

relationship, as observed by the researcher and documented by the client and other<br />

participants?<br />

• Level 3 (corresponding to Nattiez’ situations IV-V) is the level <strong>of</strong> interpretation<br />

and discourse. We try to understand and explain what happened, both through<br />

introspection and through interpretation systems with specific concepts and<br />

epistemology, e.g. clinical psychology or psychodynamic theory. Conclusions are<br />

drawn on the meaning <strong>of</strong> the music.<br />

• At the level <strong>of</strong> regulative rules (corresponding to Nattiez’ situation VI) a synthesis<br />

232<br />

is made, or in Aldridge’s own words: “therapeutic interpretation from a fixed<br />

point, but intuitively used in the therapeutic explanation”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!