29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Limitations <strong>of</strong> the study are discussed in section 8.3, also including critical comments<br />

from the participants. The development <strong>of</strong> new theoretical ideas based on the results is<br />

addressed in section 8.4, including also an appraisal <strong>of</strong> the multiple method design<br />

used in the study. Clinical applicability <strong>of</strong> the findings is discussed in section 8.5, and<br />

directions for future research are given in section 8.6. This final discussion chapter<br />

focuses more on meta reflection and consideration <strong>of</strong> limitations, clinical applicability<br />

and potential future research to avoid extensive repetition <strong>of</strong> specific discussion<br />

relating to results found in earlier chapters.<br />

9.1 Findings<br />

The main question <strong>of</strong> this study was: What is the influence <strong>of</strong> ten individual BMGIM<br />

sessions on mood and quality <strong>of</strong> life in cancer survivors? Results <strong>of</strong> the quantitative<br />

and the qualitative investigations undertaken to answer the question are summarized<br />

separately, based on the sub-questions and hypotheses addressed in the study.<br />

9.1.1 The efficacy <strong>of</strong> BMGIM in cancer rehabilitation<br />

The first subquestion was: Can ten BMGIM sessions improve the mood <strong>of</strong> the<br />

participants? This subquestion was tested by the HADS questionnaire, with four<br />

hypotheses stating that participants would report reduced anxiety and depression at<br />

post-test and follow-up compared with pre-test. The results reported in section 5.1<br />

showed that the BMGIM series reduced the reported anxiety in five <strong>of</strong> the six<br />

participants, with a significant effect found from pre-test to follow-up (p = .045), and<br />

with a very large treatment effect at both post-test (ES = 1.09) and follow-up (ES =<br />

1.33). A similar effect on depression was not found, however effect size calculations<br />

suggested a treatment effect over time for these participants (ES = 0.72 at follow-up).<br />

One important aspect <strong>of</strong> these results is that the participants’ pre-test scores on<br />

anxiety were much higher than their depression scores. Only one <strong>of</strong> the six<br />

participants was within the “normal band” <strong>of</strong> the HADS anxiety subscale at pre-test,<br />

and she (ESMA) was the one whose score did not decrease. Five <strong>of</strong> the six<br />

participants were within the “normal band” <strong>of</strong> the HADS depression subscale at pre-<br />

test, and the score <strong>of</strong> the three participants with the highest depression pre-scores all<br />

decreased at post-test and further at follow-up (table 5.2). Therefore the participants in<br />

this study reported anxiety as a much more severe problem than depression, yet it was<br />

312

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!