29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

therapist and the (client) listener’s music experience (in receptive music therapy)?<br />

Cook reviewed the most important types <strong>of</strong> musicological analysis, some <strong>of</strong> which are<br />

also used occasionally by music therapy researchers: Traditional methods (focusing<br />

on parameters like form, melody, harmony and rhythm), Schenkerian analysis<br />

(including both Schenker’s own method and later American applications <strong>of</strong> his ideas,<br />

focusing on ‘essential structures <strong>of</strong> music’), Psychological approaches (e.g. Leonard<br />

Meyer, Rudolph Reti), Formal approaches (set-theoretical analysis, semiotic analysis),<br />

and techniques <strong>of</strong> comparative analysis. – In other words: music as syntax/structure<br />

can be analysed in a number <strong>of</strong> ways.<br />

Interpretation. In traditional musicology <strong>of</strong> the 19 th and 20 th century (frequently called<br />

‘formalism’ or ‘structuralism’, see Ansdell 2001) researchers <strong>of</strong>ten had a positivist<br />

scientific ambition that made analysis <strong>of</strong> the ‘artwork as an independent universe’ the<br />

ideal, while interpretation <strong>of</strong> some sort <strong>of</strong> ‘meaning’ <strong>of</strong> the work was not considered<br />

proper. Kretzchmar’s popular “musical hermeneutics” was not taken seriously. The<br />

critical musicology <strong>of</strong> the 1970ies and 80ies and the post-modern ‘new musicology’<br />

<strong>of</strong> the last 20 years have changed the picture: it is not enough to analyse the syntax.<br />

Meaning and context must be integrated (Ansdell 1997). – In music therapy this has<br />

always been obvious: any description and/or analysis <strong>of</strong> the music must be related to<br />

the context – the client’s personality, life story, culture, and <strong>of</strong> course pathology or<br />

problem area. However, as we shall see, this can be done in many ways, and thus the<br />

re-creation or construction <strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> an improvisation may reach very<br />

different conclusions, – one researcher using e.g. object relations theory, another<br />

using Jungian analytical psychology, a third cultural anthropology as framework <strong>of</strong><br />

the interpretation. This was illustrated clearly in a series <strong>of</strong> articles published in the<br />

Nordic Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Music</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> (1998-2000), where the first session <strong>of</strong> the famous<br />

Nord<strong>of</strong>f-Robbins case “Edward” was re-interpreted in several discourses. 55<br />

<strong>Music</strong> therapy research studies using qualitative methods <strong>of</strong>ten include description,<br />

analysis and interpretation <strong>of</strong> the music as part <strong>of</strong> the research. The following<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> selected methods will be divided in two sections: a brief introduction to<br />

55 The series <strong>of</strong> re-interpretations <strong>of</strong> the ”Edward” case included the original case study by Nord<strong>of</strong>f and<br />

Robbins (1977), and contributions from the following authors: Rolvsjord, Aigen, Bergstrøm-Nielsen,<br />

Neugebauer, Robarts, Forinash and Ansdell.<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!