29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

structures or patterns that “allow us to do much more than just orient concepts, refer<br />

to them, quantify them, etc., as we do with simple orientational and ontological<br />

metaphors; they allow us, in addition, to use one highly structured and clearly<br />

delineated concept to structure another” (Lak<strong>of</strong>f and Johson 1980, p. 61). As when the<br />

complex target domain ‘love’ is structured by rich and complex source domains like<br />

‘war’ or ‘magic’.<br />

The basic elements <strong>of</strong> the theory are based on the study <strong>of</strong> conventional metaphors.<br />

However, Lak<strong>of</strong>f and Johnson also include new metaphors in their theory, their<br />

example being the complex structural metaphor ‘Love is a collaborative work <strong>of</strong> art”<br />

(p. 139ff). After an analysis <strong>of</strong> what is highlighted and hidden in this metaphor the<br />

authors conclude: “New metaphors have the power to create a new reality. This can<br />

begin to happen when we start to comprehend our experience in terms <strong>of</strong> a metaphor,<br />

and it becomes a deeper reality when we begin to act in terms <strong>of</strong> it. If a new metaphor<br />

enters the conceptual system that we base our actions on, it will alter that conceptual<br />

system and the perceptions and actions that the system gives rise to.” (p. 145).<br />

From Lak<strong>of</strong>f and Johnson’s first book the theory <strong>of</strong> metaphor developed to embrace a<br />

whole theory <strong>of</strong> cognition. Fundamental to the theory is the distinction between<br />

conceptual and linguistic metaphors, and the concept <strong>of</strong> image schemata developed by<br />

Johnson (1987).<br />

A conceptual metaphor is a non-verbal cognitive mapping between two different<br />

domains, while a linguistic metaphor is a verbal expression <strong>of</strong> such a mapping. 8<br />

Johnson’s concept <strong>of</strong> image schemata can be used to explain how the metaphorical<br />

meaning created through cross-domain mapping is grounded, not in language but in<br />

repeated patterns <strong>of</strong> bodily experience. The schema connects a vast range <strong>of</strong> related<br />

bodily experiences manifesting the same structure, e.g. verticality (up-down), part-<br />

whole, source-path-goal, the container etc. (Johnson 1987). These schemas are<br />

invoked by conceptual metaphors related to the specific schema and serve as “a<br />

source domain through which to structure target domains such as emotions,<br />

consciousness, health, and musical pitch.” (Zbikowski 1998).<br />

8 This distinction is a parallel to the distinction <strong>of</strong> image and metaphor suggested in section 3.7.4.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!