29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A RepGrid self inquiry was made in order to elicit the researcher’s perception <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constructs ‘supportive’ and ‘challenging’. The nine polarities identified in this<br />

procedure may serve as reference elements in a comprehensive RepGrid inquiry<br />

involving experienced BMGIM therapists from Denmark and abroad. I have not seen<br />

the RepGrid used in self-inquiries, and the results are no doubt biased by my pre-<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> definitions <strong>of</strong> relaxing vs. stimulating music.<br />

9.3.4 Validity and reliability issues raised by the participants.<br />

As mentioned in section 6.1 all six participants brought forward critical remarks to all<br />

three questionnaires, and they addressed problems related to both reliability and<br />

validity. During the process the participants <strong>of</strong>ten made comments on the difficulties<br />

they experienced when filling out the questionnaires, after the termination <strong>of</strong> a<br />

session. Even if the participants were <strong>of</strong>ten quite concerned about this issue, both the<br />

therapist and the researcher decided to bracket the problem and would just repeat the<br />

instruction for filling out the questionnaire – as indicated in the introductory remarks:<br />

“How has your last week been?” (HADS, QLQ-C30) or indication <strong>of</strong> the “here-and-<br />

now experience” (SOC). This meant that the problem issues were not addressed until<br />

the interviews, where they were included as a specific theme (see the interview guide<br />

App. 6.1).<br />

Reliability problems in the questionnaires:<br />

An important reliability problem is formulated by PIJØ: “Another difficulty is to<br />

distinguish between how I must answer (here-and-now, honestly) and how I would<br />

like to answer (it would be nice, if..)”. This dilemma exists in different versions:<br />

“Maybe you want to present yourself in a more positive way.” (WIFU). “In the<br />

beginning I included the fact that my life has changed since the operation, but later I<br />

thought that it is because <strong>of</strong> the operation I deal with these problems... this made me<br />

insecure: what am I actually indicating with my answers? (...) I forget many things,<br />

even problems I had! This may influence the score in a positive direction.” (SAAA).<br />

“You answer here-and-now, but your answer may be influenced by the session you<br />

just experienced. Maybe it would be better to fill out the questionnaires before the<br />

session?” (WIFU). “I know definitively, that the so-called ‘lack <strong>of</strong> change’ in my<br />

344

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!