29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

or measurable influence on the participants’ financial affairs. However, since anxiety<br />

decreased, it might be possible that perceived financial problems lessened due to the<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> anxiety, in other words, the financial problems were no longer perceived<br />

as very significant. In general, influences <strong>of</strong> BMGIM therapy on these specific<br />

symptoms were not considered in the original hypotheses, therefore no explanation<br />

can be <strong>of</strong>fered as to whether the effects observed were caused by the therapy.<br />

9.2.1.2 The efficacy <strong>of</strong> BMGIM on Quality <strong>of</strong> Life<br />

The study used two different measures <strong>of</strong> QoL. In the QLQ-C30 questionnaire QoL is<br />

addressed in two questions, and it is possible to compare scores with reference<br />

groups. In the SOC there is no specific definition <strong>of</strong> QoL, and there are no cancer<br />

reference groups.<br />

In QLQ-C30, the comparison <strong>of</strong> the study participants’ mean scores with a breast<br />

cancer reference group (fig. 5.7) showed that the study participants had a much lower<br />

QoL pre-test score than the reference group, while at post-test it was higher than the<br />

reference group (and even close to the normal population reference group), while at<br />

follow-up it was close to the breast cancer reference group. This result is important<br />

from a clinical point <strong>of</strong> view, as it supports the beneficial influence <strong>of</strong> the BMGIM<br />

interventions as reported in Burns’ and McKinney & Clark’s studies, in the larger<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> reference groups. A validity issue in using QLQ-C30 to measure QoL<br />

is that QoL is only addressed in two very broad questions, and the QoL score is<br />

calculated as a mean <strong>of</strong> the two, one asking the participant to rate her “overall health”,<br />

the other her “overall quality <strong>of</strong> life”. This pragmatic ‘definition’ <strong>of</strong> QoL may not<br />

always correspond with the participants’ or the researcher’s ideas <strong>of</strong> what QoL is. An<br />

example is ESMA who scored maximum (100) at pre-test, because she felt fine that<br />

week, physically as well as psychologically. Thus there was no possibility <strong>of</strong> an<br />

increase in her score, and actually it decreased slightly at post-test (and not one single<br />

maximum score was recorded during the process).<br />

The SOC was used in the present study to explore the influence <strong>of</strong> BMGIM on the<br />

participants ‘sense <strong>of</strong> coherence’, understood as (an important aspect <strong>of</strong>) QoL, as<br />

found in previous studies by Körlin and Wrangsjö (1995, 2001) In both studies the<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> the SOC scores indicate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> BMGIM in enhancing coping<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!