29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Within this study musical understanding is understood essentially as metaphorical (as<br />

in Cook (1990)), based on the experience <strong>of</strong> “the musical body” (Aksnes 2001), and it<br />

is shown how metaphor has clinical and theoretical relevance in music therapy.<br />

This study is the first to apply Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutic theories <strong>of</strong> metaphor and<br />

narrative on experiential material from BMGIM session series. Based on Ricoeur’s<br />

ideas three levels <strong>of</strong> metaphors in BMGIM were suggested and exemplified by the<br />

clinical literature. The levels were called 1. The narrative episode; 2. The narrative<br />

configuration <strong>of</strong> the ego and the self; 3. The complete narrative. In the empirical study<br />

<strong>of</strong> the imagery in 53 music-listening periods these metaphor levels were identified and<br />

reframed as core categories and subcategories, among other categories grounded in<br />

the data. Ricoeur’s theory <strong>of</strong> mimesis was used in the analysis <strong>of</strong> image configuration<br />

and as a theoretical framework for the understanding <strong>of</strong> the participants’ therapeutic<br />

process. A summarizing discussion <strong>of</strong> the relevance <strong>of</strong> Ricoeur’s theory to BMGIM<br />

theory follows after a discussion <strong>of</strong> how the three levels <strong>of</strong> metaphors and the<br />

categorization <strong>of</strong> the imagery may relate to existing categorizations <strong>of</strong> images and<br />

narrative structures.<br />

Goldberg (2002, p. 360) defines “music, imagery, and emotion as the primary<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> the BMGIM experience.” “Imagery” includes “images in all sensory<br />

modalities…” as understood to be visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, tactile; and<br />

“… kinaesthetic images, body sensations, feelings, thoughts and noetic images (an<br />

intuitive sense <strong>of</strong> imaginal events that arise outside <strong>of</strong> other imagery modes.” (Ibid.)<br />

With slight variations in the wording this definition is a standard categorization, found<br />

in GIM course manuals or introduction folders and used to explain “imagery” to<br />

clients as well as students. Grocke (1999) suggested a more comprehensive<br />

categorization system with 15 categories <strong>of</strong> experiences: 1. Visual experiences, 2.<br />

Memories, 3. Emotions and feelings, 4. Body sensations, 5. Body movements, 6.<br />

Somatic imagery, 7. Altered auditory experiences, 8. Associations with the music and<br />

transference to the music, 9. Abstract imagery, 10. Spiritual experiences, 11.<br />

Transpersonal experiences, 12. Archetypal figures, 13. Dialogue, 14. Aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Shadow or Anima or Animus, 15. Symbolic shapes and images (for Grocke’s<br />

complete description <strong>of</strong> the categories, see Appendix 9.1). All categories <strong>of</strong> imagery<br />

suggested by Goldberg and 14 <strong>of</strong> Grocke’s 15 categories are present in the material <strong>of</strong><br />

324

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!