29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

actually no alternative to “will”, and he proposes several definitions <strong>of</strong> this<br />

psychological component addressed by the psychotherapist, including the “trigger <strong>of</strong><br />

effort”, “responsible mover”, “mainspring <strong>of</strong> action”, “seat <strong>of</strong> volition” and, quoting<br />

Hannah Arendt, “the organ <strong>of</strong> the future” (as opposed to memory as “the organ <strong>of</strong> the<br />

past”, Yalom 1980, p. 291) The therapist addresses and tries to influence this organ,<br />

but this can very rarely, if at all, be done by simple persuasions, admonitions,<br />

injunctions or appeals to the client’s responsibility. In order to determine how the<br />

therapist may influence the will <strong>of</strong> the client and thus promote change Yalom sketches<br />

a theoretical framework for a “clinical understanding <strong>of</strong> will”. His considerations are<br />

based on the theories <strong>of</strong> Rank, Farber and May, who represent different perspectives<br />

on a will-influencing psychotherapy. Rank developed an understanding <strong>of</strong> the will as<br />

a “positive, guiding organization which utilizes creatively as well as inhibits and<br />

controls the instinctual drives” (Yalom p. 294) and he defined three stages in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the will: (1) negative or “counter will, opposition to another’s will,<br />

(2) positive will, willing what one must, (3) creative will, willing what one wants”.<br />

Stage three is the goal <strong>of</strong> all child rearing (Yalom p. 295). Farber thought that Rank<br />

overestimated the conscious dimension <strong>of</strong> the will and made an important distinction<br />

between two domains or “realms <strong>of</strong> will”: (1) The realm <strong>of</strong> unconscious decisions or<br />

choices, not directly open to influence from other people, (2) the realm <strong>of</strong> conscious<br />

considerations and decisions, object-directed and utilitarian in character. Only the<br />

second realm can be influenced therapeutically by cognitive interventions and appeal<br />

to reason. However the first realm is dominating and can only be influenced in an<br />

indirect way; it “must be approached obliquely” (Yalom p. 298-99). May contributed<br />

to the psychology <strong>of</strong> will by including the ‘wish’ as an element prior to will: the wish<br />

is “the imaginative playing with the possibility <strong>of</strong> some act or state occurring” (Yalom<br />

p.300). Wish and effort are separate stages in the process <strong>of</strong> willing, and the client<br />

may fail in both stages. This is why experiential therapies focus on the expression <strong>of</strong><br />

emotions: experiencing and expressing emotions may lead to a better relationship<br />

with self and others, and the ability to wish may be improved.<br />

It is not possible here to summarize the chain <strong>of</strong> arguments in Yalom’s theory. The<br />

main components in this context are that psychotherapy must first address and<br />

enhance the client’s ability to wish through a training enabling the client to endure the<br />

anxiety related to ‘simultaneous ambivalence’ <strong>of</strong> having conflicting wishes; second,<br />

331

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!