29.07.2013 Views

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

Dissertation - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

scores are influenced by my negative attitude towards questionnaires like these – I<br />

don’t feel they are illustrative <strong>of</strong> me and my process.” (INLA)<br />

This does not mean that the scores are considered neither arbitrary nor dependent on<br />

pure coincidence. But it means that caution is warranted when interpreting especially<br />

high and low (or no) outcomes.<br />

Validity problems in the questionnaires:<br />

The participants’ critical comments included both problems connected to the<br />

formulation <strong>of</strong> the questions (concept validity) and problems <strong>of</strong> how ‘processes <strong>of</strong><br />

change can be linked to therapeutic processes’ (internal validity, Smeijsters 1997 p.<br />

29). Here are a few examples <strong>of</strong> concept validity comments: “What is ‘a long/short<br />

walk’”? (SAAA); “Emotions are not addressed appropriately, and indicating QoL<br />

with a number does not tell what actually has been going on.” (ESMA) Then follows<br />

some examples <strong>of</strong> internal validity comments: “The questions don’t grasp the ”in-<br />

betweens” - the movements up and down between more stable periods.” (ESMA);<br />

“I cannot indicate that I was really low 4 days ago, but fine now (or the opposite). The<br />

many changes within a week cannot be scored.” (ANHO)<br />

The external validity <strong>of</strong> the findings presented in this study is unknown. The sample is<br />

small, there is no control group, and the six participants cannot be identified as<br />

representative in any way. The grounded theory presented in section 7.3 is limited to<br />

this particular group <strong>of</strong> participants. Fundamentally the validity problems could only<br />

have been minimized by the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a larger sample and a control group.<br />

Changes in the scores <strong>of</strong> the six participants may be attributed to many other factors<br />

than the music therapy. However, the combination <strong>of</strong> questionnaires and interviews<br />

allowed the participants to comment on the scores and relate them to their actual<br />

experience. This made it possible to see that the two participants who ‘changed the<br />

least’ according to the questionnaire scores, actually experienced a lot <strong>of</strong> change<br />

attributed to the music therapy, - changes that were inexpressible through the<br />

questionnaires. The four participants whose scores showed major changes<br />

(improvements) were allowed to comment on them, and they all validated the specific<br />

changes when the researcher presented the pre–post–follow-up changes in the<br />

interviews.<br />

345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!