12.02.2015 Views

1Dk4eXg

1Dk4eXg

1Dk4eXg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

nodding<br />

nodding Deflection under vertical acceleration of masses<br />

cantilevered ahead of or behind main structure, eg<br />

forward fuselage (in flight only) or engine on wing pylon<br />

well ahead of leading edge.<br />

nodding aerial One oscillating only, or principally, in<br />

vertical plane, eg HFR.<br />

noddy cap Protective cover for delicate (eg IR-homing)<br />

missile nose (RAF, colloq.).<br />

NODE National operational [ATC] display equipment.<br />

node 1 In structures, location of point where load variation<br />

causes only rotation but no linear deflection.<br />

2 Point, line or surface in wave system where some<br />

major variable has zero amplitude.<br />

3 In any network, terminal point or point where two<br />

channels branch.<br />

4 Intersection of orbit of satellite with plane of orbit of<br />

primary.<br />

5 Location in mobility system where movement is<br />

originated, processed or terminated (DoD).<br />

NODLOR Night observation device, long-range.<br />

no-draft forging One forged essentially to finish dimensions,<br />

thus needing little if any machining.<br />

NODS 1 Night observation and detection system.<br />

2 Near-object detection sensor.<br />

nodular cast iron See SG cast iron.<br />

NOE Nap of the Earth, ie flight as low as posible over<br />

undulating terrain.<br />

noed Knot (F).<br />

no-escape zone In AAM engagement with fast target,<br />

often less than 0.25 maximum AAM range.<br />

NOF International Notam Office (ICAO).<br />

no-feathering axis Axis of swashplate, about which there<br />

is no feathering moment or first-harmonic variation of<br />

cyclic pitch.<br />

no-feathering plane That in which an observer sees no<br />

variation in cyclic pitch [helicoper rotor].<br />

no-flare landing Aeroplane landing (rarely, other<br />

aircraft) in which approach trajectory is continued in<br />

essentially straight line until landing gear hits ground.<br />

no-fly list Passengers who, for whatever reason, are<br />

permanently denied boarding (TSA).<br />

no-fly zone Airspace prohibited to the aircraft of that<br />

country, and [usually] patrolled by aircraft of a hostile<br />

country to ensure compliance.<br />

NOFORN No foreign [dissemination of information]<br />

(US).<br />

Nogaps Navy operational global atmospheric prediction<br />

system (USN).<br />

no-go gauge One whose linear dimension (between<br />

faces, threads or diameter) is just below smallest permitted<br />

limit for part.<br />

no-go item One whose failure or absence from aircraft<br />

prohibits takeoff according to operating rules (though not<br />

necessarily rendering it unairworthy).<br />

NOGS, Nogs Night observation gunship system.<br />

NOI 1 Notice of intention.<br />

2 Notice of Inquiry (US).<br />

3 NCCT operations interface.<br />

NOISE National Organization to Insure [sic] a Soundcontrolled<br />

Environment (US).<br />

noise 1 Noise in air. Basic unit is decibel, dB, 0.1 bel,<br />

measure of sound pressure above local atmosphere on<br />

logarithmic scale, usually related to starting reference<br />

pressure of 2 × 10 –5 Nm –2 . Sound pressure level L = 10 log<br />

noise<br />

p 2 /p o 2 = 20 log (p/p o ) where p o is reference pressure and p<br />

actual measured pressure. Alternative is to use source<br />

power level L W = 10 log (W/W o ) dB where W o is reference<br />

power commonly taken to be 10 –12 W (Watts). Pressure<br />

levels are more common, and log scale allows for millionfold<br />

increase in human perceived pressures, each 6 dB<br />

increment representing doubling of pressure level. Study<br />

of aircraft noise from 1952 led to many new measures in<br />

attempts to quantify noise nuisance. In 1953 CNR<br />

(Community Noise Rating) gave single-number scale<br />

based on public response to six generally quantifiable<br />

factors, and in 1957 NC (Noise Criteria) curves attempted<br />

to portray equal-loudness contours taking into account<br />

discrete tones, impulsive nature of some sounds and other<br />

variables. By this time many workers had tried to quantify<br />

human aural response to different frequencies and<br />

tones with mixed frequencies, and curves drawn in 1959<br />

were labelled L PN (Perceived Noise Level) in units of<br />

dB(PN), sometimes written PNdB. Despite its complexity<br />

this gained major foothold, and virtually eliminated<br />

traditional measures (phon, relating sound pressure level<br />

to standard 1 kHz tone, and sone, loudness corresponding<br />

to 40 phons). Various weighted dB measures were introduced<br />

for the measures taken by meters with scales<br />

adjusted to equal-loudness contours for different overall<br />

pressure levels, these being called by various letters (thus,<br />

A-weighted = dBA = L A ). In 1961 a series of surveys<br />

measured annoyance according to new measures, L PN50 or<br />

L PN90 (L PN exceeded by 50 or 90 per cent of aircraft), D 85<br />

or D 95 (10 log time in seconds when sound pressure<br />

exceeded 85 or 95 dB), and N (number of aircraft ‘passing<br />

over’, latter criterion not being defined); result was single<br />

value for location called NNI (Noise and Number Index).<br />

Another 1961 unit was derived by splitting noise into onethird-octave<br />

bands and assigning each band a Noy rating<br />

by comparing with subjective noisiness of random noise<br />

centred on 1 kHz; individual Noy figures then added by<br />

method allowing for masking of one band by others and<br />

presented in PNdB. Further work allowing for particular<br />

features – such as intense pure tones, as from compressor<br />

blading, in otherwise broadband jet sound – led to use of<br />

L EPN (Effective Perceived Noise Level) measured in<br />

EPNdB (Effective Perceived Noise dB) in first-draft legislation<br />

in 1966, which led to FAR Pt 36 and subsequently<br />

closely similar ICAO Annex 16. By that time at least 20<br />

national or local authorities had published research,<br />

including Australia’s AI (Annoyance Index) = L – PN + 10<br />

log N; German Störindex Q – based on dBA; French R-<br />

index = L – PN + 10 log N-30; Dutch Total Noise Rating B<br />

based on log of summation of A-weighted pressure levels;<br />

American CNR (Community Noise Rating) based on<br />

many variables; California’s CNEL (Community Noise<br />

Equivalent Level) using WECPNLs (Weighted<br />

Equivalent Continuous Perceived Noise Levels) varying<br />

with time of day and season; American NEF (Noise<br />

Exposure Forecast) = L – EPN + 10 log N-K where K is 88<br />

by day and 76 by night; the European Community’s<br />

L DEN = noise from all sources [noise density] summed<br />

through each 24 h; South Africa’s NI (Noisiness Index) =<br />

L – × 10 log N + 10 log T a /T where T a and T are times;<br />

British TNI (Traffic Noise Index) and resulting L eq<br />

(Equivalent Average Sound Pressure Level), which led to<br />

L NP (Noise Pollution Level) = L eq + 2.56 σ where σ is standard<br />

deviation of dB fluctuations. Further measures<br />

449

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!