10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E-learn<strong>in</strong>g – an <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

❘<br />

89<br />

Issue<br />

Table 7.1 Hypothetical teach<strong>in</strong>g situations <strong>and</strong> possible e-learn<strong>in</strong>g responses<br />

E-learn<strong>in</strong>g activity<br />

1 There is time pressure on<br />

lectures, where students<br />

sometimes arrive without<br />

sufficient background<br />

knowledge; more ground<br />

needs to be covered than time<br />

allows.<br />

2 Students are tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>complete<br />

notes, <strong>and</strong> are rely<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

PowerPo<strong>in</strong>t h<strong>and</strong>outs (posted<br />

on the VLE) as their ma<strong>in</strong><br />

record of the lectures.<br />

3 Student numbers are so high<br />

that the traditional <strong>for</strong>mat of<br />

sem<strong>in</strong>ars is stra<strong>in</strong>ed to break<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

4 On a language course, students<br />

are not gett<strong>in</strong>g enough<br />

scheduled time to practise<br />

conversation, <strong>and</strong> are at<br />

different levels of com<strong>for</strong>t.<br />

5 Dur<strong>in</strong>g a year abroad/on<br />

placements/<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, it is<br />

clear that some students drift<br />

away from their peers <strong>and</strong> the<br />

university; data suggest that<br />

the drop-out rate climbs dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this time.<br />

6 In a first-year history course it<br />

becomes clear that there are<br />

two major problems: some<br />

students lack a basic<br />

knowledge of the period, <strong>and</strong><br />

some students use sources<br />

<strong>in</strong>discrim<strong>in</strong>ately <strong>and</strong> without<br />

reference.<br />

The lecturer records themselves speak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

each week, <strong>for</strong> 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes, on his or her mobile, cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

background po<strong>in</strong>ts. These are then uploaded as ‘course<br />

podcasts’ <strong>in</strong>to either the VLE or podcast-enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

software. The students are <strong>in</strong>vited to submit questions<br />

they have about the podcast content via the VLE discussion<br />

board, <strong>and</strong> the lecturer will address the most<br />

pert<strong>in</strong>ent of these be<strong>for</strong>e the live lecture commences.<br />

The lecturer stops distribut<strong>in</strong>g the PowerPo<strong>in</strong>t slides,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stead asks the students to take thorough notes <strong>and</strong><br />

post these with<strong>in</strong> the VLE discussion board <strong>for</strong> their<br />

peers to see, <strong>and</strong> to comment on <strong>in</strong>accuracies. If the<br />

lecturer has control over the assessment structure, a<br />

small part of the assessment may be given to this post<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> critiqu<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />

The lecturer asks students to post observations <strong>and</strong><br />

comments <strong>in</strong> the VLE’s discussion <strong>for</strong>um after the<br />

lecture, <strong>and</strong> to respond to each other’s posts (the lecturer<br />

may kick-start this by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g threads with<br />

particular questions or topics). The live sem<strong>in</strong>ar is used<br />

to conclude these discussions <strong>and</strong> to answer any<br />

outst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g questions that have arisen from them.<br />

The lecturer posts a sound file of themselves, start<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

debate or conversation about a relevant topic. Students<br />

are then required to reply, first to the lecturer <strong>and</strong> then to<br />

each other, <strong>and</strong> to post these files <strong>in</strong> either a discussion<br />

board or <strong>in</strong> a ‘voice board’ us<strong>in</strong>g either free record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

software <strong>and</strong> microphones or with voice-record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

software now found <strong>in</strong> many universities such as<br />

WIMBA Voice Tools (a sort of onl<strong>in</strong>e language lab).<br />

The course teams sets up a discussion board with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

VLE, or mail<strong>in</strong>g list, or a social network, <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

encourage a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g sense of cohesion among the<br />

cohort. This may end up be<strong>in</strong>g student-led <strong>and</strong> largely<br />

social, but with departmental news made available<br />

<strong>and</strong> any questions answered by staff.<br />

The lecturer sets a task where students <strong>in</strong> small groups<br />

research a particular area of historical background, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the onl<strong>in</strong>e library search tools to locate relevant electronic<br />

sources. The group then presents this as a written<br />

narrative on a wiki or with<strong>in</strong> a VLE, <strong>and</strong> clearly<br />

references the sources. Other students are asked to<br />

comment <strong>and</strong> to critique the strength of these sources,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to suggest others where appropriate. This is assessed.<br />

(Cont<strong>in</strong>ued)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!