10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190 ❘<br />

<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, supervis<strong>in</strong>g, learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g programmes. Regular monitor<strong>in</strong>g considers how well programmes <strong>and</strong><br />

students are achiev<strong>in</strong>g the stated aims <strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

external exam<strong>in</strong>ers’ reports, student feedback, assessment results <strong>and</strong> feedback from<br />

employers. Periodic programme review (typically five-yearly) may <strong>in</strong>volve external<br />

reviewers <strong>and</strong> consider the currency <strong>and</strong> validity of programmes or services as well as<br />

achievement aga<strong>in</strong>st stated aims <strong>and</strong> outcomes.<br />

Case study 1: Staff development through quality<br />

assurance at the University of Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire<br />

One of the explicit aims of <strong>academic</strong> QA <strong>and</strong> enhancement at the university is to<br />

‘foster subject, pedagogical <strong>and</strong> staff development’. This happens <strong>in</strong> three key<br />

ways.<br />

• Template documentation <strong>for</strong> programme validation <strong>and</strong> review aligns with<br />

external <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal QA mechanisms. Programme specification templates<br />

map aga<strong>in</strong>st QAA subject benchmark statements, requir<strong>in</strong>g clear identification<br />

of QAA def<strong>in</strong>ed skills. At module level, templates ensure mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the external programme specification to <strong>in</strong>ternal module specification <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>clude a framework that aligns module outcomes with learn<strong>in</strong>g, teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> assessment methods.<br />

• By adopt<strong>in</strong>g a ‘developmental’ approach to programme development <strong>and</strong><br />

validation, <strong>academic</strong>, adm<strong>in</strong>istrative, learn<strong>in</strong>g resource <strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technology staff work together <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g programmes, support<strong>in</strong>g<br />

documentation <strong>and</strong> engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> peer review. This fosters an <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

dialogue <strong>and</strong> exchange of ideas as well as a ‘team approach’ to design <strong>and</strong><br />

delivery, aligned with the university’s educational strategy.<br />

• A ‘staged’ approach to programme accreditation <strong>and</strong> review <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

‘Faculty-level validation’ prior to university validation. This provides an<br />

opportunity to review the quality of documentation, identify resource issues<br />

<strong>and</strong> ‘rehearse’ the validation process with colleagues. This <strong>in</strong> turn enables<br />

staff to develop underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> skills <strong>in</strong> QA processes, better prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them to take part <strong>in</strong> external <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional QA events.<br />

(Clare Morris, Associate Dean (Curriculum), Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire <strong>and</strong> Hert<strong>for</strong>dshire<br />

Postgraduate Medical School, University of Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire)<br />

Internal quality assurance procedures <strong>and</strong> development activities to enhance educational<br />

quality <strong>in</strong>clude the evaluation of <strong>in</strong>dividual staff members through systems such as<br />

student feedback questionnaires, peer review systems, mentor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> new staff or regular<br />

appraisals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!