10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

student learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Heather Fry, Steve Ketteridge<br />

<strong>and</strong> Stephanie Marshall<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It is un<strong>for</strong>tunate, but true, that some <strong>academic</strong>s teach students without hav<strong>in</strong>g much<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal knowledge of how students learn. Many lecturers know how they learnt/learn<br />

best, but do not necessarily consider how their students learn <strong>and</strong> if the way they teach<br />

is predicated on enabl<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g to happen. Nor do they necessarily have the concepts<br />

to underst<strong>and</strong>, expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> articulate the process they sense is happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their<br />

students.<br />

<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is about how we perceive <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> the world, about mak<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Marton <strong>and</strong> Booth, 1997). But ‘learn<strong>in</strong>g’ is not a s<strong>in</strong>gle th<strong>in</strong>g; it may <strong>in</strong>volve master<strong>in</strong>g<br />

abstract pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g proofs, remember<strong>in</strong>g factual <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation, acquir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods, techniques <strong>and</strong> approaches, recognition, reason<strong>in</strong>g, debat<strong>in</strong>g ideas, or<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g behaviour appropriate to specific situations; it is about change.<br />

Despite many years of research <strong>in</strong>to learn<strong>in</strong>g, it is not easy to translate this knowledge<br />

<strong>in</strong>to practical implications <strong>for</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g. There are no simple answers to the questions<br />

‘how do we learn?’ <strong>and</strong> ‘how as teachers can we br<strong>in</strong>g about learn<strong>in</strong>g?’ This is partly<br />

because education deals with specific purposes <strong>and</strong> contexts that differ from each other<br />

<strong>and</strong> with students as people, who are diverse <strong>in</strong> all respects, <strong>and</strong> ever chang<strong>in</strong>g. Not<br />

everyone learns <strong>in</strong> the same way, or equally readily about all types of material. The<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> level of material to be learnt have an <strong>in</strong>fluence. Students br<strong>in</strong>g different<br />

backgrounds <strong>and</strong> expectations to learn<strong>in</strong>g. Our knowledge about the relationship<br />

between teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>complete <strong>and</strong> the attitudes <strong>and</strong> actions of both parties<br />

affect the outcome, but we do know enough to make some firm statements about types<br />

of action that will usually be helpful <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g to happen. In this chapter some<br />

of the major learn<strong>in</strong>g theories that are relevant to higher education are <strong>in</strong>troduced. In the<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>e of education a theory is someth<strong>in</strong>g built from research evidence, which may<br />

have explanatory power; much educational research is not about prov<strong>in</strong>g or disprov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

theories, but about creat<strong>in</strong>g them from research data.<br />

❘<br />

8<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!