10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

396 ❘<br />

<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the discipl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

grounds that they take up too much time. Those us<strong>in</strong>g a conceptual, or deep,<br />

approach to learn<strong>in</strong>g are will<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>vest time <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g sure they underst<strong>and</strong><br />

key concepts because this ga<strong>in</strong>s them long-term reward. Second, modular courses<br />

tend to encourage ‘th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a course box’. The atomisation of knowledge<br />

<strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g that often occurs can also create a barrier to critical read<strong>in</strong>g. Third,<br />

there can be barriers to critical read<strong>in</strong>g created by the cultural problems faced by<br />

students who have been educated under different educational philosophies. In<br />

cultures where knowledge is demonstrated by reiteration of published authors’<br />

work <strong>and</strong> where question<strong>in</strong>g an author’s ideas is not encouraged, a more critical<br />

approach can be stressful <strong>for</strong> the student.<br />

The development of critical read<strong>in</strong>g frameworks to support students<br />

The development of critical read<strong>in</strong>g frameworks can help overcome these<br />

barriers. The frameworks discussed here were developed from the literature<br />

(Cormack, 2002; November, 2000) <strong>and</strong> augmented dur<strong>in</strong>g years of teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

undergraduate <strong>and</strong> postgraduate bus<strong>in</strong>ess students. They provide an opportunity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the student to enter <strong>in</strong>to a focused dialogue. The pro-<strong>for</strong>ma structure supports<br />

the student <strong>in</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g down a seem<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>timidat<strong>in</strong>g body of work <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g the key elements of a number of different papers to <strong>for</strong>m a logical<br />

review of a body of literature. Two frameworks have been developed: one <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>academic</strong> papers us<strong>in</strong>g empirical data <strong>and</strong> one <strong>for</strong> purely conceptual papers.<br />

Table 24.1 shows the critical read<strong>in</strong>g framework <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mer. We suggest that<br />

the frameworks should be used both <strong>for</strong>mally <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mally with<strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Formal approach<br />

Critical read<strong>in</strong>g can be embedded with<strong>in</strong> the assessment of a module. At the<br />

simplest level, it can <strong>for</strong>m a part of the assessment criteria of the module <strong>and</strong> this<br />

can be made explicit, with grades allocated aga<strong>in</strong>st the criteria (Qu<strong>in</strong>ton <strong>and</strong><br />

Smallbone, 2006: 87f.). This ensures that students take the requirement <strong>for</strong> critical<br />

read<strong>in</strong>g seriously. Another way of encourag<strong>in</strong>g critical read<strong>in</strong>g is to make a<br />

critically reflective piece of writ<strong>in</strong>g part of the assessment. For example, students<br />

may be required, as part of an assignment (500 words out of a 2,500-word essay),<br />

to reflect on the significance, validity, reliability <strong>and</strong> extent to which they could<br />

generalise from the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of their sources.<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mal approach<br />

The Journals Club, a voluntary, <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal lunch-time critical read<strong>in</strong>g club, was set<br />

up to help students grapple with <strong>academic</strong> journal articles which they might f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>in</strong>timidat<strong>in</strong>g if attempt<strong>in</strong>g to read them <strong>in</strong>dependently. It was widely publicised<br />

to undergraduates, postgraduate students <strong>and</strong> staff. Students were given access

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!