10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g courses<br />

<strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Dai Hounsell<br />

Evaluation is a way of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effects of our teach<strong>in</strong>g on students’ learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

It implies collect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about our work, <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong><br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g judgements about which actions we should take to improve practice. . . .<br />

Evaluation is an analytical process that is <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to good teach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

(Ramsden, 1992: 209)<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It is almost 40 years s<strong>in</strong>ce the publication of The Assessment of University <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (Falk <strong>and</strong><br />

Dow, 1971), the first book of its k<strong>in</strong>d to appear <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>. Initially, the very idea that<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> higher education might be evaluated proved highly controversial. Some<br />

<strong>academic</strong>s considered it an affront to their <strong>academic</strong> autonomy, while others viewed it as<br />

needless kowtow<strong>in</strong>g to student op<strong>in</strong>ion. Nowadays, evaluation raises very few eyebrows.<br />

It is widely seen not only as a necessary step towards accountability, but also as an <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

part of good professional practice <strong>and</strong> the systematic development of teach<strong>in</strong>g expertise.<br />

From this contemporary st<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t, excellence <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g is not simply<br />

the product of experience. It depends on the regular monitor<strong>in</strong>g of teach<strong>in</strong>g per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

to p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t achievements, build on strengths, <strong>and</strong> identify areas where there is scope <strong>for</strong><br />

improvement.<br />

Alongside acceptance of the <strong>in</strong>dispensability of evaluation have come sharper<br />

differentiation of purposes <strong>and</strong>, accompany<strong>in</strong>g that shift, greater methodological<br />

sophistication. For many years, approaches to evaluation were strongly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />

practices <strong>in</strong> the USA, where st<strong>and</strong>ardised student rat<strong>in</strong>gs questionnaires had been<br />

developed chiefly <strong>for</strong> summative purposes: to compare the teach<strong>in</strong>g per<strong>for</strong>mance of<br />

different <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions about tenure <strong>and</strong> promotion (D’Andrea <strong>and</strong><br />

Gosl<strong>in</strong>g, 2005). But <strong>in</strong> universities <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>and</strong> Australasia, evaluation purposes have<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>antly been <strong>for</strong>mative <strong>and</strong> developmental (i.e. to enhance quality), <strong>and</strong> the focus<br />

❘<br />

198<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!