10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Account<strong>in</strong>g, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> management<br />

❘<br />

395<br />

Interrogat<strong>in</strong>g practice<br />

• Review a course that you currently teach. To what extent do the written<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>for</strong> your course reflect what you are actually try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

achieve?<br />

• How might you change your assessment strategy <strong>in</strong> order to better align<br />

it with outcomes, or change the focus of your course or the motivation of<br />

students?<br />

with their practice. As discussed above, the bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment has seen a huge<br />

expansion <strong>in</strong> the knowledge base. Moreover, we have become much more aware of the<br />

importance of students be<strong>in</strong>g able to identify their own personal knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

experiences. In this way students can identify their own personal relevances as well as<br />

those <strong>for</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess more generally.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g two case studies address these issues <strong>in</strong> different contexts. Case study<br />

3 addresses the issue of how best to support students <strong>in</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g critical readers. Case<br />

study 4 uses the notion of ‘leadership’ to provide a lively <strong>and</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>gful context <strong>for</strong><br />

students to reflect on their own skills <strong>and</strong> to l<strong>in</strong>k this with a study of the theory of<br />

leadership.<br />

Case study 3: Support<strong>in</strong>g students <strong>in</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g critical<br />

readers<br />

What is meant by critical read<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Critical <strong>academic</strong> equiry can be a rather abstract concept <strong>for</strong> a student to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>. So we start with this issue <strong>and</strong> emphasise to students that be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

critical entails not only ask<strong>in</strong>g ‘why’ of the external world <strong>and</strong> of what one reads<br />

but also exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g oneself <strong>and</strong> one’s own underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g research philosophy.<br />

We emphasise that challeng<strong>in</strong>g the ideas <strong>and</strong> the research conducted by others is<br />

accepted practice. However, this <strong>in</strong>volves scepticism or reasoned doubt rather<br />

than destructive criticism. The aim is to achieve a constructive overview.<br />

Barriers to critical read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Students do not f<strong>in</strong>d critical read<strong>in</strong>g easy. First, research (Case <strong>and</strong> Gunstone,<br />

2003) shows that time is a dom<strong>in</strong>ant issue <strong>for</strong> students. Those students who take<br />

a surface approach to learn<strong>in</strong>g avoid tasks <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!