10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 ❘<br />

<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, supervis<strong>in</strong>g, learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

encourages the students to consider how they will ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> develop their<br />

skills <strong>and</strong> apply them <strong>in</strong> future <strong>in</strong>terviews with patients (Kolb’s abstract<br />

conceptualisation, active experimentation). To encourage active experimentation,<br />

students may be offered the chance to repeat sections of the role play to see if a<br />

different approach would have been more effective.<br />

By encourag<strong>in</strong>g reflection after role plays we aim to develop students’ attitudes<br />

to reflective practice so that they will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to use it <strong>in</strong> encounters with real<br />

patients, not only while they are study<strong>in</strong>g, but throughout their professional lives.<br />

(Dr Tanya Tierney, Faculty of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Imperial College London)<br />

LEARNING STYLES AND RELATED IDEAS<br />

<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> styles is one of the most widely used terms <strong>in</strong> relation to student learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

However, the notion of learn<strong>in</strong>g styles is problematic. There are several categorisations<br />

of ‘styles’; research-based evidence of their existence is sparse (Coffield et al., 2004);<br />

the term is sometimes misused to mean approaches to learn<strong>in</strong>g, or the two are conflated.<br />

However, even though learners may have preferences it may be that they should be<br />

encouraged to use a range of learn<strong>in</strong>g styles, <strong>in</strong> which case those responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

organis<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g should create opportunities <strong>for</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g that are sensitive to different<br />

styles, <strong>and</strong> do not simply reflect how they or their students like to learn.<br />

Three categorisations of learn<strong>in</strong>g style are mentioned below. Pask (1976) identified<br />

serialist <strong>and</strong> holist learn<strong>in</strong>g styles. A serialist is said to prefer a step-by-step approach<br />

<strong>and</strong> a narrow focus while holists prefer to obta<strong>in</strong> the ‘big picture’ <strong>and</strong> to work with<br />

illustrations <strong>and</strong> analogies.<br />

Perhaps the best-known categorisation of learn<strong>in</strong>g style is that of Honey <strong>and</strong> Mum<strong>for</strong>d<br />

(1982). They offer a fourfold classification of activist, pragmatist, reflector <strong>and</strong> theorist:<br />

• Activists respond most positively to learn<strong>in</strong>g situations offer<strong>in</strong>g challenge, to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

new experiences <strong>and</strong> problems, excitement <strong>and</strong> freedom <strong>in</strong> their learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Reflectors respond most positively to structured learn<strong>in</strong>g activities where they are<br />

provided with time to observe, reflect <strong>and</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>and</strong> allowed to work <strong>in</strong> a detailed<br />

manner.<br />

• Theorists respond well to logical, rational structure <strong>and</strong> clear aims, where they are<br />

given time <strong>for</strong> methodical exploration <strong>and</strong> opportunities to question <strong>and</strong> stretch their<br />

<strong>in</strong>tellect.<br />

• Pragmatists respond most positively to practically based, immediately relevant<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g activities, which allow scope <strong>for</strong> practice <strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g theory.<br />

They suggest that the preferred learn<strong>in</strong>g style of any <strong>in</strong>dividual will <strong>in</strong>clude elements<br />

from two or more of these categories.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!