10.06.2017 Views

A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing academic and Practice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the discipl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

❘<br />

225<br />

Becher, T <strong>and</strong> Trowler, P R (2001) Academic Tribes <strong>and</strong> Territories: Intellectual Enquiry <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Cultures of Discipl<strong>in</strong>es, Buck<strong>in</strong>gham: SRHE/Open University Press.<br />

Berthiaume, D (2007) What is the nature of university professors’ discipl<strong>in</strong>e-specific<br />

pedagogical knowledge? A descriptive multicase study (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation),<br />

Montreal: McGill University.<br />

Biglan, A (1973) ‘The characteristics of subject matter <strong>in</strong> different <strong>academic</strong> areas’, Journal of<br />

Applied Psychology, 57(3): 195–203.<br />

Donald, J G (2002) <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> to Th<strong>in</strong>k: Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary Perspectives, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.<br />

Hiebert, J, Gallimore, R <strong>and</strong> Stigler, J W (2002) ‘A knowledge base <strong>for</strong> the teach<strong>in</strong>g profession:<br />

what would it look like <strong>and</strong> how can we get one?’, <strong>Education</strong>al Researcher, 31(5): 3–15.<br />

Hofer, B K <strong>and</strong> P<strong>in</strong>trich, P R (2002) Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> Know<strong>in</strong>g, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.<br />

Lenze, L F (1995) ‘Discipl<strong>in</strong>e-specific pedagogical knowledge <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guistics <strong>and</strong> Spanish’, <strong>in</strong><br />

N Hativa <strong>and</strong> M Mar<strong>in</strong>covich (eds), Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary Differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong>:<br />

Implications <strong>for</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> (pp. 65–70), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.<br />

McAlp<strong>in</strong>e, L, Weston, C, Beauchamp, J, Wiseman, C <strong>and</strong> Beauchamp, C (1999) ‘Build<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

metacognitive model of reflection’, <strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, 37: 105–131.<br />

Munby, H, Russell, T <strong>and</strong> Mart<strong>in</strong>, A K (2001) ‘Teachers’ knowledge <strong>and</strong> how it develops’, <strong>in</strong><br />

V. Richardson (ed.), <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> of Research on <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (pp. 877–904), Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC:<br />

American <strong>Education</strong>al Research Association.<br />

Neumann, R (2001) ‘Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary differences <strong>and</strong> university teach<strong>in</strong>g’, Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Higher</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong>, 26(2): 135–146.<br />

Perry, W G (1998) Forms of Ethical <strong>and</strong> Intellectual Development <strong>in</strong> the College Years: A Scheme,<br />

San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (orig<strong>in</strong>ally published <strong>in</strong> 1970, New York: Holt, R<strong>in</strong>ehart<br />

<strong>and</strong> W<strong>in</strong>ston).<br />

Schommer-Aik<strong>in</strong>s, M (2002) ‘An evolv<strong>in</strong>g theoretical framework <strong>for</strong> an epistemological belief<br />

system’, <strong>in</strong> B K Hofer <strong>and</strong> P R P<strong>in</strong>trich (eds), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs<br />

about Knowledge <strong>and</strong> Know<strong>in</strong>g (pp. 103–118), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.<br />

Shulman, L (1986) ‘Those who underst<strong>and</strong>: knowledge growth <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g’, <strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Researcher, 15(2): 4–14.<br />

FURTHER READING<br />

Gess-Newsome, J <strong>and</strong> Lederman, N G (eds) (1999) Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Pedagogical Content Knowledge:<br />

The Construct <strong>and</strong> its Implications <strong>for</strong> Science <strong>Education</strong>, Dordrecht: Kluwer. A thorough<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the notion of pedagogical content knowledge, the primary/secondary<br />

school equivalent to DPK.<br />

Hativa, N <strong>and</strong> Goodyear, P (eds) (2002) Teacher Th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, Beliefs, <strong>and</strong> Knowledge <strong>in</strong> <strong>Higher</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong>, Dordrecht: Kluwer. The various chapters present the elements <strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

knowledge base of university teachers.<br />

Hativa, N <strong>and</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>covich, M (eds) (1995) Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary Differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong>:<br />

Implications <strong>for</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Comprehensive exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the<br />

various aspects of discipl<strong>in</strong>ary specificity at university level.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>strell, J (1999) ‘Expertise <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g’, <strong>in</strong> R J Sternberg <strong>and</strong> J A Horvath (eds), Tacit<br />

Knowledge <strong>in</strong> Professional <strong>Practice</strong> (pp. 215–230), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Thorough<br />

explanation of the l<strong>in</strong>k between expertise <strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!