21.02.2018 Views

The Essential Guide to Family & Medical Leave

The purpose of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is to help employees balance the demands of work and family. But the law can be hard for employers to apply in the real world. Questions about eligibility, coverage, notice and certification requirements, administering leave, continuing benefits, and reinstatement can challenge even the most experienced managers. This book has the plain-English answers to all of your tough questions about the FMLA. It provides detailed information, real-life examples, sample forms, and other tools to help you meet your legal obligations.

The purpose of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is to help employees balance the demands of work and family. But the law can be hard for employers to apply in the real world. Questions about eligibility, coverage, notice and certification requirements, administering leave, continuing benefits, and reinstatement can challenge even the most experienced managers.

This book has the plain-English answers to all of your tough questions about the FMLA. It provides detailed information, real-life examples, sample forms, and other tools to help you meet your legal obligations.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218 | the essential guide <strong>to</strong> family and medical leave<br />

Lessons from the<br />

Real World<br />

A company must reinstate an employee<br />

within two days or face the consequences.<br />

Lori Hoge worked at a Honda production plant. Honda assigned her <strong>to</strong> a<br />

“door line” position, which accommodated work restrictions she had because<br />

of a back injury.<br />

On May 11, 2000, Hoge began taking FMLA leave for a planned abdominal<br />

surgery. She reported for work on June 27. She said this was the agreedupon<br />

date for her return <strong>to</strong> work; Honda said that it didn’t expect her <strong>to</strong><br />

return until sometime in July.<br />

When Hoge reported for work, Honda <strong>to</strong>ld her it did not have an available<br />

position that accommodated her work restrictions because of changes <strong>to</strong><br />

its manufacturing process. On July 31, 2000, she was reinstated on a parttime<br />

basis <strong>to</strong> a position on the engine line, and she didn’t receive a full-time<br />

position until September 18.<br />

Hoge sued Honda for failing <strong>to</strong> reinstate her when she was ready <strong>to</strong> return<br />

<strong>to</strong> work. Honda argued that it was entitled <strong>to</strong> take a “reasonable” amount<br />

of time <strong>to</strong> find an appropriate job, both because it didn’t know when Hoge<br />

was returning <strong>to</strong> work and because her former position had changed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> court sided with Hoge. <strong>The</strong> FMLA says employees are entitled <strong>to</strong><br />

reinstatement upon their return <strong>to</strong> work, not within a reasonable time after<br />

they return. If Honda didn’t know that Hoge was returning <strong>to</strong> work on June<br />

27, it was entitled <strong>to</strong> take two days—the amount of notice Hoge should<br />

have given—<strong>to</strong> reinstate her <strong>to</strong> an equivalent, full-time position. Because<br />

Honda <strong>to</strong>ok several months <strong>to</strong> fully reinstate Hoge, it lost the case.<br />

Hoge v. Honda of America, 384 F.3d 238 (6th Cir. 2004).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!