11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

III. Analyzing the<br />

Communication Process<br />

6. Source, Message, and<br />

Channel Factors<br />

A study by Anand-Keller and Block provides support for this perspective<br />

on how fear operates. 58 They examined the conditions under which low- and<br />

high-fear appeals urging people to stop smoking are likely to be effective.<br />

Their study indicated that a communication using a low level of fear may be<br />

ineffective because it results in insufficient motivation to elaborate on the<br />

harmful consequences of engaging in the destructive behavior (smoking).<br />

However, an appeal arousing high levels of fear was ineffective because it<br />

resulted in too much elaboration on the harmful consequences. This led to<br />

defensive tendencies such as message avoidance and interfered with processing<br />

of recommended solutions to the problem.<br />

Another approach to the curvilinear explanation of fear is the protection<br />

motivation model. 59 According to this theory, four cognitive appraisal<br />

processes mediate the individual’s response to the threat: appraising (1) the<br />

information available regarding the severity of the perceived threat, (2) the<br />

perceived probability that the threat will occur, (3) the perceived ability of a<br />

coping behavior to remove the threat, and (4) the individual’s perceived ability<br />

to carry out the coping behavior.<br />

This model suggests that both the cognitive appraisal of the information in<br />

a fear appeal message and the emotional response mediate persuasion. An<br />

audience is more likely to continue processing threat-related information, thereby<br />

increasing the likelihood that a coping behavior will occur.<br />

The protection motivation model suggests that ads using fear appeals should give<br />

the target audience information about the severity of the threat, the probability of its<br />

occurrence, the effectiveness of a coping response, and the ease with which the<br />

response can be implemented. 60 For example, the Havrix ad in Exhibit 6-14 discusses<br />

how tourists can pick up hepatitis A when traveling to high-risk areas outside the<br />

United States and describes the severity of the problem. However, the ad reduces anxiety<br />

by offering a solution to the problem—a vaccination with Havrix.<br />

It is also important to consider how the target audience may respond. Fear appeals<br />

are more effective when the message recipient is self-confident and prefers to cope<br />

with dangers rather than avoid them. 61 They are also more effective among nonusers<br />

of a product than among users. Thus, a fear appeal may be better at keeping nonsmokers<br />

from starting than persuading smokers to stop.<br />

In reviewing research on fear appeals, Herbert Rotfeld has argued that some of the<br />

studies may be confusing different types of threats and the level of potential harm portrayed<br />

in the message with fear, which is an emotional response. 62 He concludes that<br />

the relationship between the emotional responses of fear or arousal and persuasion is<br />

not curvilinear but rather is monotonic and positive, meaning that<br />

higher levels of fear do result in greater persuasion. However, Rotfeld<br />

notes that not all fear messages are equally effective, because different<br />

people fear different things. Thus they will respond differently to the<br />

same threat, so the strongest threats are not always the most persuasive.<br />

This suggests that marketers using fear appeals must consider the emotional<br />

responses generated by the message and how they will affect<br />

reactions to the message.<br />

Humor Appeals Humorous ads are often the best known and best<br />

remembered of all advertising messages. Many advertisers, including<br />

FedEx, Little Caesar’s pizza, Pepsi, and Budweiser, have used humor<br />

appeals effectively. Humor is usually presented through radio and TV<br />

commercials as these media lend themselves to the execution of humorous<br />

messages. However, humor is occasionally used in print ads as well.<br />

The clever PayDay ad shown in Exhibit 6-15 is an excellent example of<br />

how humor can be used to attract attention and convey a key selling<br />

point in a magazine ad.<br />

Advertisers use humor for many reasons. Humorous messages attract<br />

and hold consumers’ attention. They enhance effectiveness by putting<br />

consumers in a positive mood, increasing their liking of the ad itself and<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

Exhibit 6-14 This ad uses<br />

a mild fear appeal but<br />

reduces anxiety by offering<br />

a solution to the problem<br />

Exhibit 6-15 This clever<br />

ad is an example of how<br />

humor can be executed in<br />

print media<br />

185<br />

Chapter Six Source, Message, and Channel Factors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!