11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

V. Developing the<br />

Integrated Marketing<br />

Communications Program<br />

17. Public Relations,<br />

Publicity, and Corporate<br />

Advertising<br />

single chapter in this text, we suggest you peruse one of the many books available on<br />

this subject for additional insights.<br />

Advantages and Disadvantages of Publicity<br />

Publicity offers the advantages of credibility, news value, significant word-of-mouth<br />

communications, and a perception of being endorsed by the media. Beyond the potential<br />

impact of negative publicity, two major problems arise from the use of publicity:<br />

timing and accuracy.<br />

Timing Timing of the publicity is not always completely under the control of the<br />

marketer. Unless the press thinks the information has very high news value, the timing<br />

of the press release is entirely up to the media—if it gets released at all. Thus, the<br />

information may be released earlier than desired or too late to make an impact.<br />

Accuracy A major way to get publicity is the press release. Unfortunately, the<br />

information sometimes gets lost in translation—that is, it is not always reported the<br />

way the provider wishes it to be. As a result, inaccurate information, omissions, or<br />

other errors may result. Sometimes when you see a publicity piece that was written on<br />

the basis of a press release, you wonder if the two are even about the same topic.<br />

Measuring the Effectiveness of Publicity<br />

The methods for measuring the effects of publicity are essentially the same as those<br />

discussed earlier under the broader topic of public relations. Rather than reiterate them<br />

here, we thought it would be more interesting to show you an actual example. Figure<br />

17-5 is a model developed by Ketchum Public Relations for tracking the effects of<br />

publicity. (I guess we just provided Ketchum with some free publicity.)<br />

One of the more controversial forms of advertising is corporate<br />

advertising. Actually an extension of the public relations function,<br />

corporate advertising does not promote any one specific product or<br />

service. Rather, it is designed to promote the firm overall, by enhancing its image,<br />

assuming a position on a social issue or cause, or seeking direct involvement in something.<br />

Why is corporate advertising controversial? A number of reasons are offered:<br />

1. Consumers are not interested in this form of advertising. A Gallup and Robinson<br />

study reported in Advertising Age found consumers were 35 percent less interested in<br />

corporate ads than in product-oriented advertising. 28 This may be because consumers<br />

do not understand the reasons behind such ads. Of course, much of this confusion<br />

results from ads that are not very good from a communications standpoint.<br />

2. It’s a costly form of self-indulgence. Firms have been accused of engaging in<br />

corporate image advertising only to satisfy the egos of top management. This argument<br />

stems from the fact that corporate ads are not easy to write. The message to be<br />

communicated is not as precise and specific as one designed to position a product, so<br />

the top managers often dictate the content of the ad, and the copy reflects their ideas<br />

and images of the corporation.<br />

3. The firm must be in trouble. Some critics believe the only time firms engage in corporate<br />

advertising is when they are in trouble—either in a financial sense or in the<br />

public eye—and are advertising to attempt to remedy the problem. There are a number<br />

of forms of corporate advertising, each with its own objectives. These critics argue<br />

that these objectives have become important only because the firm has not been managed<br />

properly.<br />

4. Corporate advertising is a waste of money. Given that the ads do not directly<br />

appeal to anyone, are not understood, and do not promote anything specific, critics say<br />

the monies could be better spent in other areas. Again, much of this argument has its<br />

foundation in the fact that corporate image ads are often intangible. They typically do<br />

not ask directly for a purchase; they do not ask for investors. Rather, they present a<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

Corporate Advertising<br />

583<br />

Chapter Seventeen Public Relations, Publicity, and Corporate Advertising

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!