11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

Summary<br />

This chapter has examined the role<br />

of objectives in the planning and<br />

evaluation of the IMC program and<br />

how firms budget in an attempt to<br />

achieve these objectives. Specific<br />

objectives are needed to guide the<br />

development of the promotional<br />

program, as well as to provide a<br />

benchmark against which performance<br />

can be measured and evaluated.<br />

Objectives serve important<br />

functions as communications<br />

devices, as a guide to planning the<br />

IMC program and deciding on various<br />

alternatives, and for measurement<br />

and evaluation.<br />

Objectives for IMC evolve from<br />

the organization’s overall marketing<br />

plan and are based on the roles<br />

various promotional mix elements<br />

play in the marketing program.<br />

Many managers use sales or a<br />

related measure such as market<br />

share as the basis for setting<br />

objectives. However, many promotional<br />

planners believe the role of<br />

advertising and other promotional<br />

mix elements is to communicate<br />

because of the various problems<br />

232<br />

IV. Objectives and<br />

Budgeting for Integrated<br />

Marketing<br />

Communications Programs<br />

7. Establishing Objectives<br />

and Budgeting for the<br />

Promotional Program<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

• Characteristics of the decision maker (preferences and experience).<br />

• Approval and negotiation channels.<br />

• Pressure on senior managers to arrive at the optimal budget.<br />

One example of how these factors might influence allocations relates to the level of<br />

interaction between marketing and other functional departments, such as accounting<br />

and operations. The authors note that the relative importance of advertising versus sales<br />

promotion might vary from department to department. Accountants, being dollars-andcents<br />

minded, would argue for the sales impact of promotions, while operations would<br />

argue against sales promotions because the sudden surges in demand that might result<br />

would throw off production schedules. The marketing department might be influenced<br />

by the thinking of either of these groups in making its decision.<br />

The use of outside consultants to provide expert opinions might also affect the allocation<br />

decision. Trade journals, academic journals, and even books might also be valuable<br />

inputs into the decision maker’s thinking. In sum, it seems obvious that many<br />

factors must be taken into account in the budget allocation decision. Market size and<br />

potential, specific objectives sought, and previous company and/or agency policies<br />

and preferences all influence this decision.<br />

associated with sales-based objectives.<br />

They use communicationsbased<br />

objectives like those in the<br />

response hierarchy as the basis for<br />

setting goals.<br />

Much of the emphasis in setting<br />

objectives has been on traditional<br />

advertising-based views of marketing<br />

communications. However,<br />

many companies are moving<br />

toward zero-based communications<br />

planning, which focuses on<br />

what tasks need to be done, which<br />

marketing communication functions<br />

should be used, and to what<br />

extent. Many of the principles used<br />

in setting advertising objectives<br />

can be applied to other elements in<br />

the promotional mix.<br />

As you have probably concluded,<br />

the budget decision is not typically<br />

based on supporting experiences<br />

or strong theoretical foundations.<br />

Nor is it one of the more soundly<br />

established elements of the promotional<br />

program. The budgeting<br />

methods used now have some<br />

major problems. Economic models<br />

are limited, often try to<br />

demonstrate the effects on sales<br />

directly, and ignore other elements<br />

of the marketing mix. Some of the<br />

methods discussed have no<br />

theoretical basis and ignore the<br />

roles advertising and promotion<br />

are meant to perform.<br />

One possible way to improve the<br />

budget appropriation is to tie the<br />

measures of effectiveness to communications<br />

objectives rather than<br />

to the broader-based marketing<br />

objectives. Using the objective<br />

and task approach with communications<br />

objectives may not be the<br />

ultimate solution to the budgeting<br />

problem, but it is an improvement<br />

over the top-down methods. Marketers<br />

often find it advantageous<br />

to employ a combination of<br />

methods.<br />

As with determining the budget,<br />

managers must consider a number<br />

of factors when allocating advertising<br />

and promotions dollars. Market<br />

size and potential, agency policies,<br />

and the preferences of management<br />

itself may influence the allocation<br />

decision.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!