11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

776<br />

Part Seven Special Topics and Perspectives<br />

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

Exhibit 22-20 Advertising<br />

is very important to<br />

companies such as Daewoo<br />

Motor America as it enters<br />

the U.S. market<br />

Exhibit 22-21 This ad<br />

refutes the argument that<br />

reducing advertising<br />

expenditures will lead to<br />

lower prices<br />

VII. Special Topics and<br />

Perspectives<br />

22. Evaluating the Social,<br />

Ethical, & Economic<br />

Aspects of Advtising &<br />

Promotion<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

Exhibit 22-20 shows an ad for the company’s flagship<br />

Leganza model, which is positioned as offering “affordable<br />

luxury.”<br />

Effects on Product Costs and Prices<br />

A major area of debate among economists, advertisers,<br />

consumer advocates, and policymakers concerns the<br />

effects of advertising on product costs and prices. Critics<br />

argue that advertising increases the prices consumers pay<br />

for products and services. First, they say the large sums<br />

of money spent advertising a brand constitute an expense<br />

that must be covered and the consumer ends up paying<br />

for it through higher prices. This is a common criticism<br />

from consumer advocates. Several studies show that<br />

firms with higher relative prices advertise their products<br />

more intensely than do those with lower relative prices. 95<br />

As discussed in the previous chapter, concern has been<br />

expressed that the tremendous increase in direct-toconsumer<br />

drug advertising by pharmaceutical companies<br />

in recent years is driving up the cost of prescription<br />

drugs. Critics argue that the millions of dollars spent on<br />

advertising and other forms of promotion are an expense<br />

that must be covered by charging higher prices. 96<br />

A second way advertising can result in higher prices is<br />

by increasing product differentiation and adding to the<br />

perceived value of the product in consumers’ minds. Paul<br />

Farris and Mark Albion note that product differentiation<br />

occupies a central position in theories of advertising’s<br />

economic effects. 97 The fundamental premise is that advertising increases the perceived<br />

differences between physically homogeneous products and enables advertised<br />

brands to command a premium price without an increase in quality.<br />

Critics of advertising generally point to the differences in prices between national<br />

brands and private-label brands that are physically similar, such as aspirin or tea bags, as<br />

evidence of the added value created by advertising. They see consumers’willingness to pay<br />

more for heavily advertised national brands rather than purchasing the lower-priced, nonadvertised<br />

brand as wasteful and irrational. The prescription drug industry is again a very<br />

good example of this, as critics argue that the increase in advertising is encouraging consumers<br />

to request brand-name drugs and steering them away from lower-priced generics. 98<br />

However, consumers do not always buy for rational, functional reasons. The emotional,<br />

psychological, and social benefits derived from purchasing a national<br />

brand are important to many people. Moreover, say Albion and Farris,<br />

Unfortunately there seems to be no single way to measure product differentiation,<br />

let alone determine how much is excessive or attributable to the<br />

effects of advertising . . . Both price insensitivity and brand loyalty could be<br />

created by a number of factors such as higher product quality, better packaging,<br />

favorable use experience and market position. They are probably related<br />

to each other but need not be the result of advertising. 99<br />

Proponents of advertising offer several other counterarguments to<br />

the claim that advertising increases prices. They acknowledge that<br />

advertising costs are at least partly paid for by consumers. But advertising<br />

may help lower the overall cost of a product more than enough to<br />

offset them. For example, advertising may help firms achieve<br />

economies of scale in production and distribution by providing information<br />

to and stimulating demand among mass markets. These<br />

economies of scale help cut the cost of producing and marketing the<br />

product, which can lead to lower prices—if the advertiser chooses to<br />

pass the cost savings on to the consumer. The ad in Exhibit 22-21, from<br />

a campaign sponsored by the American Association of Advertising<br />

Agencies, emphasizes this point.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!