11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

648<br />

Part Six Monitoring, Evaluation, and Control<br />

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

VI. Monitoring, Evaluation,<br />

and Control<br />

19. Measuring the<br />

Effectiveness of the<br />

Promotional Program<br />

Measuring the Effectiveness<br />

of Other Program Elements<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

Last but not least is principle 9, the concern for reliability and validity. Most of the<br />

measures discussed are lacking in at least one of these criteria, yet these are two of the<br />

most critical distinctions between good and bad research. If a study is properly<br />

designed, and by that we mean it addresses principles 1 through 8, it should be both<br />

reliable and valid.<br />

Essentials of Effective Testing<br />

Simply put, good tests of advertising effectiveness must address the nine principles<br />

established by PACT. One of the easiest ways to accomplish this is by following the<br />

decision sequence model in formulating promotional plans.<br />

• Establish communications objectives. We have stated that except for a few instances<br />

(most specifically direct-response advertising), it is nearly impossible to show the<br />

direct impact of advertising on sales. So the marketing objectives established for the<br />

promotional program are not good measures of communication effectiveness. For<br />

example, it is very difficult (or too expensive) to demonstrate the effect of an ad on<br />

brand share or on sales. On the other hand, attainment of communications objectives<br />

can be measured and leads to the accomplishment of marketing objectives.<br />

• Use a consumer response model. Early in this text we reviewed hierarchy of effects<br />

models and cognitive response models, which provide an understanding of the effects<br />

of communications and lend themselves to achieving communications goals.<br />

• Use both pretests and posttests. From a cost standpoint—both actual cost outlays<br />

and opportunity costs—pretesting makes sense. It may mean the difference between<br />

success or failure of the campaign or the product. But it should work in conjunction<br />

with posttests, which avoid the limitations of pretests, use much larger samples, and<br />

take place in more natural settings. Posttesting may be required to determine the true<br />

effectiveness of the ad or campaign.<br />

• Use multiple measures. Many attempts to measure the effectiveness of advertising<br />

focus on one major dependent variable—perhaps sales, recall, or recognition. As<br />

noted earlier in this chapter, advertising may have a variety of effects on the<br />

consumer, some of which can be measured through traditional methods, others that<br />

require updated thinking (recall the discussion on physiological responses). For a true<br />

assessment of advertising effectiveness, a number of measures may be required. The<br />

Ogilvy Award winners mentioned earlier employed multiple measures to track the<br />

effects on communications objectives.<br />

• Understand and implement proper research. It is critical to understand research<br />

methodology. What constitutes a good design? Is it valid and reliable? Does it<br />

measure what we need it to? There is no shortcut to this criterion, and there is no way<br />

to avoid it if you truly want to measure the effects of advertising.<br />

A major study sponsored by the Advertising Research Foundation (ARF), involving<br />

interviews with 12,000 to 15,000 people, addressed some of these issues. 36 While<br />

we do not have the space to analyze this study here, note that the research was<br />

designed to evaluate measures of copy tests, compare copy testing procedures, and<br />

examine some of the PACT principles. Information on this study has been published in<br />

a number of academic and trade journals and by the ARF.<br />

Throughout this text, we have discussed how and<br />

when promotional program elements should be used,<br />

the advantages and disadvantages of each, and so on.<br />

In many chapters we have discussed measures of<br />

effectiveness used to evaluate these programs. In the<br />

final section of this chapter, we add a few measures that were not discussed earlier.<br />

Measuring the Effectiveness of Sales Promotions<br />

Sales promotions are not limited to retailers and resellers of products. Sports marketers<br />

have found them a very effective way to attract crowds and have been able to<br />

measure their relative effectiveness by the number of fans attending games. Major

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!