11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

VI. Monitoring, Evaluation,<br />

and Control<br />

19. Measuring the<br />

Effectiveness of the<br />

Promotional Program<br />

Sales Percent Change<br />

During Event from Average<br />

Product Market (Dollar or Volume) Sales<br />

Snacks Louisville $119,841 +52%<br />

Salt Lake City $135,500 +47<br />

Indianapolis $347,940 +105<br />

Soap Atlanta 950 cases +375<br />

Minneapolis 880 cases +867<br />

Cleveland 972 cases +238<br />

Portland, OR 580 cases +580<br />

St. Louis 1,616 cases +1,454<br />

Salad dressing Atlanta NA +175<br />

Salt Lake City NA +143<br />

Performance Research in Newport, Rhode Island, measures impact on brand<br />

awareness and image shifts. PS Productions, a Chicago-based research organization,<br />

provides clients with a measure of event sponsorships based on increased sales. PS<br />

calculates sales goals based on the cost of the event and the value of extras like<br />

donated media, customized displays, ads for key retailers, and tickets given away. An<br />

event is a success if it brings in at least that amount in additional sales (Figure 19-20).<br />

While each of these measures has its advantages and disadvantages, we suggest<br />

using several in assessing the impact of sponsorships. In addition to those mentioned<br />

here, the eight-step process suggested in Figure 19-21 could be used to guide these<br />

evaluations.<br />

Measuring the Effectiveness<br />

of Other IMC Program Elements<br />

Many of the organizations mentioned in this chapter offer research services to measure<br />

the effectiveness of specific promotional program elements. As we noted at the outset<br />

of this chapter, the increased use of integrated marketing communications programs has<br />

led to more interest in determining the synergistic effects of all program elements. A<br />

review of the Ogilvy Award winners from 1993 to date demonstrates the increased integration<br />

of additional media (as opposed to specifically the best advertising campaign)<br />

1. Narrowly define objectives with specifics.<br />

2. Establish solid strategies against which programming will be benchmarked and<br />

measure your programming and effectiveness against the benchmark.<br />

3. Set measurable and realistic goals; make sure everything you do supports them.<br />

4. Enhance, rather than just change, other marketing variables.<br />

5. Don’t pull Marketing Plan 101 off the shelf. Programming should be crafted to<br />

reflect the particulars of your company’s constituencies and target audiences.<br />

6. Define the scope of your involvement. Will it involve multiple areas within the<br />

company? Who internally and externally comprises the team?<br />

7. Think “long term.” It takes time to build brand equity. Also, think of leveraging your<br />

sponsorship through programming for as long as possible, before and after the<br />

event.<br />

8. Build evaluation and a related budget into your overall sponsoring program. Include<br />

items such as pre- and post-event attitude surveys, media analysis, and sales results.<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

Figure 19-20 Sales impact<br />

of concert sponsorships<br />

(average four to six weeks)<br />

Figure 19-21 Eight<br />

steps to measuring event<br />

sponsorship<br />

651<br />

Chapter Nineteen Measuring the Effectiveness of the Promotional Program

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!