11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

I. Introduction to Integrated<br />

Marketing<br />

Communications<br />

2. The Role of IMC in the<br />

Marketing Process<br />

tion, and perceived value. From an IMC perspective, the price must be consistent with<br />

the perceptions of the product, as well as the communications strategy. Higher prices,<br />

of course, will communicate a higher product quality, while lower prices reflect bargain<br />

or “value” perceptions (Exhibit 2-26). A product positioned as highest quality but<br />

carrying a lower price than competitors will only confuse consumers. In other words,<br />

the price, the advertising, and the distribution channels must present one unified voice<br />

speaking to the product’s positioning.<br />

Relating Price to Advertising and Promotion Factors such as product<br />

quality, competition, and advertising all interact in determining what price a firm can and<br />

should charge. The relationship among price, product quality, and advertising was examined<br />

in one study using information on 227 consumer businesses from the Profit Impact<br />

of Marketing Strategies (PIMS) project of the Strategic Planning Institute. 19 Several interesting<br />

findings concerning the interaction of these variables emerged from this study:<br />

• Brands with high relative advertising budgets were able to charge premium prices,<br />

whereas brands that spent less than their competitors on advertising charged lower prices.<br />

• Companies with high-quality products charged high relative prices for the extra<br />

quality, but businesses with high quality and high advertising levels obtained the highest<br />

prices. Conversely, businesses with low quality and low advertising charged the<br />

lowest prices.<br />

• The positive relationship between high relative advertising and price levels was<br />

stronger for products in the late stage of the product life cycle, for market leaders, and<br />

for low-cost products (under $10).<br />

• Companies with relatively high prices and high advertising expenditures showed a<br />

higher return on investment than companies with relatively low prices and high advertising<br />

budgets.<br />

• Companies with high-quality products were hurt the most, in terms of return on<br />

investment, by inconsistent advertising and pricing strategies.<br />

Exhibit 2-26 Some<br />

products compete on the<br />

basis of quality rather<br />

than price<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

61<br />

Chapter Two The Role of IMC in the Marketing Process

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!