11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

VI. Monitoring, Evaluation,<br />

and Control<br />

19. Measuring the<br />

Effectiveness of the<br />

Promotional Program<br />

Despite the rise in popularity of electronic response mechanisms, the traditional reader<br />

service, or “bingo card,” remains the most common way to respond to trade<br />

publication advertising.<br />

Ad Response Methods Used Frequently or Very Frequently*<br />

Indirect Methods<br />

Return reader service cards 41%<br />

Save ads for reference 35<br />

Discuss advertised products with others 30<br />

Pass ads on to others for possible action<br />

Direct Methods<br />

26<br />

Send back reply cards/coupons 31%<br />

Contact vendors’ websites 28<br />

Telephone manufacturers 23<br />

Telephone local distributors/reps 22<br />

Go to magazine websites 21<br />

Stop at vendors’ trade show exhibits 20<br />

Discuss products with sales reps 20<br />

Send faxes to vendors 17<br />

Contact distributors’ websites 15<br />

Send e-mail messages 10<br />

Mail notes to vendors 6<br />

*The 2,705 respondents could name more than one method.<br />

Major advantages of inquiry tests are that they are inexpensive to implement and<br />

they provide some feedback with respect to the general effectiveness of the ad or<br />

medium used. But they are usually not very effective for comparing different versions<br />

or specific creative aspects of an ad.<br />

Recognition Tests Perhaps the most common posttest of print ads is the recognition<br />

method, most closely associated with Roper ASW. The Starch Ad Readership<br />

Report lets the advertiser assess the impact of an ad in a single issue of a magazine,<br />

over time, and/or across different magazines (see Figure 19-14). Starch measures over<br />

Objective: Determining recognition of print ads and comparing them to other ads of<br />

the same variety or in the same magazine.<br />

Method: Samples are drawn from 20 to 30 urban areas reflecting the geographic<br />

circulation of the magazine. Personal interviewers screen readers for<br />

qualifications and determine exposure and readership. Samples include a<br />

minimum of 200 males and females, as well as specific audiences where<br />

required. Participants are asked to go through the magazines, looking at<br />

the ads, and provide specific responses.<br />

Output: Starch Ad Readership Reports generate three recognition scores:<br />

• Noted score—the percentage of readers who remember seeing the ad.<br />

• Seen-associated score—the percentage of readers who recall seeing or<br />

reading any part of the ad identifying the product or brand.<br />

• Read-most score—the percentage of readers who report reading at<br />

least half of the copy portion of the ad.<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

Figure 19-13 Ad response<br />

methods<br />

Figure 19-14 The Starch<br />

Ad Readership Report<br />

641<br />

Chapter Nineteen Measuring the Effectiveness of the Promotional Program

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!