11.01.2013 Views

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

Selecciones - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belch: Advertising and<br />

Promotion, Sixth Edition<br />

IMC PERSPECTIVE 6-4<br />

186<br />

III. Analyzing the<br />

Communication Process<br />

6. Source, Message, and<br />

Channel Factors<br />

Do Humorous Ads Wear Out Too Fast?<br />

An issue of much concern to advertisers is the problem<br />

of commercial wearout, or the tendency of a message<br />

to lose its effectiveness when it is seen repeatedly.<br />

Wearout may occur for several reasons. One is inattention;<br />

consumers may no longer attend to an ad after<br />

several exposures, so the message loses its effectiveness.<br />

Another reason is that consumers may become<br />

annoyed at seeing an ad many times.<br />

While wearout is a problem for any type of commercial,<br />

some advertising experts argue that humorous<br />

ads wear out much sooner than other formats because<br />

once the viewer gets the joke, the ad becomes boring.<br />

However, advocates of humor argue that ads filled with<br />

yuks are effective longer because consumers can tolerate<br />

a well-executed humorous commercial again and<br />

again.<br />

So who is right? Well, a study conducted by<br />

Research Systems Corp. concludes that neither view is<br />

correct. Humorous ads wear out at the same rate as<br />

other types of ads, whether the commercials include<br />

comparative messages, celebrity spokespeople, or<br />

other approaches. According to the study, the average<br />

ad’s effectiveness wears out within eight weeks.<br />

Not everyone agrees with this study. Another<br />

research firm, Video Storyboard Tests, claims that<br />

humorous ads lose their effectiveness faster than<br />

other ads. Says the company’s president, “The first<br />

time the ad is funny, the second time the ad is acceptable,<br />

and the third time it is a bore.”<br />

While individual humorous ads may get old fast,<br />

advertisers often get around this problem by using<br />

humorous campaigns consisting of many different<br />

commercials. For example, the Little Caesar’s pizza<br />

chain, FedEx, Energizer batteries, Pepsi, and Anheuser-<br />

Busch (Budweiser and Bud Light beer) have made<br />

© The McGraw−Hill<br />

Companies, 2003<br />

effective use of humor by constantly developing new<br />

commercials and working them into the ad rotation.<br />

One media consultant argues that it’s quite simple<br />

to determine if a humorous spot or campaign is wearing<br />

out. “If the viewers laugh with you, you can be in it<br />

for the long haul. It’s when they laugh at you that<br />

you’re in trouble.”<br />

Sources: Dottie Enrico,“Humorous Touch Resonates with Consumers,”<br />

USA Today, May 13, 1996, p. 3B; Kevin Goldman, “Ever Hear the One<br />

about the Funny Ad?” The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 2, 1993, p. B11.<br />

their feeling toward the product or service. And humor can distract the receiver from<br />

counterarguing against the message. 63<br />

Critics argue that funny ads draw people to the humorous situation but distract<br />

them from the brand and its attributes. Also, effective humor can be difficult to produce<br />

and some attempts are too subtle for mass audiences. And, as discussed in IMC<br />

Perspective 6-4, there is concern that humorous ads may wear out faster than serious<br />

appeals.<br />

Clearly, there are valid reasons both for and against the use of humor in advertising.<br />

Not every product or service lends itself to a humorous approach. A number of studies<br />

have found that the effectiveness of humor depends on several factors, including the<br />

type of product and audience characteristics. 64 For example, humor has been more<br />

prevalent and more effective with low-involvement, feeling products than highinvolvement,<br />

thinking products. 65 An interesting study surveyed the research and creative<br />

directors of the top 150 advertising agencies. 66 They were asked to name which<br />

communications objectives are facilitated through the appropriate situational use of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!