07.05.2013 Views

Descarga archivo PDF (20MB) - Biometría

Descarga archivo PDF (20MB) - Biometría

Descarga archivo PDF (20MB) - Biometría

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in conditions of full democracy (CEPAL; 2010). In his inauguration address, President Kirchner<br />

said: “It is the State which must take the greatest role in repairing social inequality, working<br />

constantly to secure inclusion, creating opportunities through strengthening the possibility of<br />

access to education, health and housing and promoting social progress based on the effort and<br />

industry of each individual.” (KIRCHNER; 2003)<br />

Based on this vision, inclusive policies, especially in respect of education, employment and<br />

infrastructure, were created by the government on a consensual basis. The implementation of<br />

these policies presented a significant challenge. One of the first issues to be resolved was the<br />

ability to identify those to be benefited. Another important aspect was that digital inclusion<br />

was contemplated from the very beginning. The State was considered to have a predominant<br />

role in guaranteeing equal access to public goods, one of which relates to closing the digital gap<br />

and facilitating the participation of everyone in the knowledge society.<br />

As a consequence, as CEPAL has pointed out, the policies developed by the Argentine<br />

government succeeded in transforming the structure of production on the basis of coordinated<br />

policies. Improvement was achieved in the country’s industrial profile, stimulating those<br />

sectors with greatest innovation; its technological profile, strengthening offer and matching<br />

it with demand; and its education profile, through the provision of computer equipment in<br />

public schools and investment equivalent to 6.7% of GDP (CEPAL; 2010). As a consequence of<br />

these policies, unemployment fell by 50% (see Diagram No.1) and the size of the workforce<br />

contributing to GDP grew significantly, reaching 44.9% in 2010 (see Diagram No. 2).<br />

Diagram No. 1: Evolution of employment levels<br />

Unemployment<br />

2003: 1.750.000 unemployed<br />

2010: 852.000 unemployed<br />

Source: Indec. http://www.presidencia.gov.ar/component/content/article/138-indicadores/6177-desempleo<br />

BIOMETRICS 2 275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!