Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

LTdz 1952 — A. Švābe, K. Straubergs, E. Hauzenberga-Šturma. Latviešu tautas
dziesmas (Chansons populaires lettonnes). I–XII sēj. Kopenhāgena, 1952–1956.
SAPRGE 2008 — Puču i vaļsts volūda latgaliski. Piektdiena, 4. jūlijs (2008) 13:18
(Skatīta versija: http://diena.lv/lat/tautas_balss/blog/saprge/pucu-voludalatgaliski
(12.01.2011))
VA 2009 — I. Šuplinska, S. Lazdiņa (red.). Valodas Austrumlatvijā: pētījuma dati un
rezultāti. („Via Latgalica“ pielikums 1). Rēzekne, 2009.
VPSV 2007 — Valodniecības pamatterminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca. Rīga, 2007.
Де-Вос 2001 — Дж. Де-Воc. Этнический плюрализм: конфликт и адаптация //
Личность, культура, этнос. Современная психологическая антропология.
Москва, 2001. — c. 14–23.
Жинкин 1958 — Н. Жинкин. Механизмы речи. Москва, 1958.
Марченко 1996 ― Е. Марченко; Э. Архангельская. Лингвистический анализ
текста. Даугавпилс, 1996.
Степанов 1994 — Ю. Степанов. Слово. Из статьи для словаря концептов («Концептуария»)
русской культуры // Philologica 1 (1994) (Skatīta versija:
http://www.rvb.ru/philologica/01/01stepanov.htm (01.02.2011)).
Тайлор 2000 ― Э. Тайлор Миф и обряд в первобытной культуре. Смоленск,
2000. — 624 с.
Фрезер 2001 ― Дж. Фрезер. Золотая ветвь: Исследование магии и религии: I–II.
Москва, 2001.
Ци 2010 — В. Ци. Эволюция концептов язык — речь — слово в русской филологической
традиции: Исторический аспект. Москва, 2010.
Semantic Modifications of Language and Speech in Latgalian Fairytales
In the discourse of contemporary science, culture and mass media, language is
recognized to be one of the most essential elements of one’s ethnic identity. The aim
of the research is to identify the most ancient collective layers of linguistic
understanding by revealing the semantic context of language and speech in Latgalian
fairytales. For this purpose a linguistic-culturological method has been chosen which
focuses on language and speech as concepts which cover their paradigmatic,
syntagmatic and word-formation relations. Fairytales as a genre of oral folklore
reveal a broad and semantically diverse context of language and speech. In the
relation between language and speech preference is given to expressions of speech
which relate to the frequency of their use and their functional application. In
fairytales, language has not become a symbol of ethnic self-awareness yet, but it
functions within the fundamental mythological paradigm as an element
differentiating one’s “own” and an “alien” world. The understanding of language is
broadened by lexical synonyms which acquire independent levels of understanding
based on mythological traditions in the individual context. It also has additional
functions in the course of the plot and with regard to the typology of characters.
Verbal expressions of speech reveal an understanding of speech and an amplitude of
its application implemented both at the cognitive and the emotional levels.
129