31.10.2013 Views

Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

db//theses/available/etd-11162010-104432/unrestricted/KotzeCR.pdf<br />

(10.10.2010.).<br />

Landry, Bourhis 1997 — R. Landry, R. Bourhis. Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic<br />

Vitality: An Empirical Study // Journal of Language and Social<br />

Psychology, 16, № 1. 1997. — p. 23–49.<br />

Marten 2010 — H. F. Marten. Linguistic Landscape under Strict State Language<br />

Policy: Reversing the Soviet Legacy in a Regional Centre in Latvia // Linguistic<br />

Landscape in City. Bristol, 2010. — p. 115–132.<br />

Nekvapil 2006 — J. Nekvapil. From Language Planning to Language Management //<br />

Sociolinguistica, 20, 2006. — p. 92–100.<br />

Nunes, Onofri, Cenoz, Gorter (2008) — P. Nunes, L. Onofri, J. Cenoz, D. Gorter.<br />

Language diversity in urban landscapes: An econometric study //<br />

http://www.ceep-europe.org/workshop_files/workshop48_143.pdf<br />

(07.08.2010.).<br />

Pavlenko 2010 — A. Pavlenko. Linguistic landscape of Kyiv, Ukraine: A diachronic<br />

study // E. Shohamy, Eliezer Ben-Rafael, and Monica Barni (eds.) Linguistic<br />

Landscape in the City. Bristol, 2010. — p. 133–150.<br />

Pošeiko 2009 — S. Pošeiko. Sociolingvistiskā vide Jēkabpils un Preiļu rajonā //<br />

Maģistra darbs. 2. 5. pielikums. Baltu filoloģijas pētniecības centrs. 2009.<br />

Scollon&Scollon 2003 — R. Scollon, S. W. Scollon. Discourses in Place: Language<br />

in Material World. London/New York, 2003.– p. 1–25.<br />

Shohamy 2006 — E. Shohamy. Language Policy. Hidden agendas and new<br />

approaches. New York/London, 2006. — p. 110–135.<br />

Spolsky 2009 — B. Spolsky. Prolegomena to a sociolinguistic theory of publicē<br />

signage // E. Shohamy, D. Gorter (eds.). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the<br />

Scenery. New York/London, 2009. — p. 25–39.<br />

Šuplinska, Lazdiņa 2009 — I. Šuplinska, S. Lazdiņa (red). Valodas Austrumlatvijā:<br />

pētījuma dati un rezultāti („Via Latgalica“ pielikums 1). Rēzekne, 2009.<br />

UNESCO — A methodology for assessing language vitality and endangerment //<br />

http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php?pg=00142 (11.10.2010.).<br />

Perspectives of Latgalian in the Linguistic Landscape of the Region of Latgale<br />

The Latgalian language is a unique value of the region of Latgale that should<br />

be cherished and refined. The linguistic landscape plays an important role in its<br />

preservation and the improvement of its vitality (i.e. its appreciation and the<br />

realization of its potential) since it is closely related to the development of a positive<br />

attitude to the language and to language prestige among different speech<br />

communities, to an improvement of the self-confidence of language users, to<br />

language acquisition, and to strengthening the writing tradition.<br />

However, information gathered about the Latgalian language in the linguistic<br />

landscape shows that the use of Latgalian in Latgale is insignificant (29 language<br />

signs), despite the fact that people want to see more information in Latgalian and that<br />

the predominant linguistic attitude is positive. The potential of Latgalian has not been<br />

realized due to poor writing skills, an unawareness of possible functions of the<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!