31.10.2013 Views

Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

Latgalistikys kongresu materiali, III. 2011. - Latvijas Universitāte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

— Sociology of language: sociology with a focus on language (no interest<br />

in geographical variation);<br />

— Geography of language: geography with a focus on language (no interest<br />

in social variation).<br />

Linguistics<br />

Geography<br />

Sociology<br />

Space<br />

(diatopic<br />

variation)<br />

Geolinguistics<br />

Geography<br />

of languages<br />

Language<br />

Society<br />

(diastratic<br />

variation)<br />

Sociolinguistics<br />

Sociology of<br />

language<br />

72<br />

Figure 1: Language as research focus<br />

It is clear that specific studies and scientific analyses can be based on<br />

more than one of these (sub)disciplines, or on an overlapping of any of<br />

them.<br />

Survey Latgale, for example, the data of which will be taken in consideration<br />

here, is a research project that approaches language use from<br />

both geographical and sociological points of view. It consists of a large sociolinguistic<br />

survey of language use as declared by the residents of Eastern<br />

Latvia. It aims at analysing when, where and with whom the languages of<br />

the region are used — but not at internal language variation within society.<br />

For this survey, more than 9100 persons were interviewed in<br />

125 municipalities of Eastern Latvia — mainly in the historical region of<br />

Latgale — grouped into 74 demographically homogeneous areas (see Lazdiņa,<br />

Šuplinska 2009, Dell’Aquila, Iannàccaro 2008c and, for a cartographical<br />

approach, Dell’Aquila, Iannàccaro 2009).<br />

In this paper we will discuss a type of cross-disciplinary analysis<br />

which adds a geographical point of view to sociolinguistics and, more<br />

deeply, to sociology of language. In particular we will consider a dialectometric<br />

approach to the sociolinguistic data (see also Dell’Aquila, Iannàccaro<br />

2008a, 2008b, and Dell’Aquila 2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!