13.04.2013 Views

Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações ... - Funag

Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações ... - Funag

Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações ... - Funag

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

azil-china and the reordering of international relations<br />

3. <strong>China</strong> and the GATT/WTO<br />

In 1979, <strong>China</strong> adopted the “open door” policy, and subsequently,<br />

<strong>China</strong> started a step-by-step approach to re-integrate itself in the GATT/<br />

WTO. In 1983, <strong>China</strong> became a signatory of the MFA (Multi-fibre<br />

Arrangement). In 1986, <strong>China</strong> started the accession negotiations and<br />

decided to: i) resume its GATT Contracting Party status; ii) undertake<br />

tariff concessions; and iii) negotiate as a developing country. <strong>China</strong> was<br />

also a full participant in the Uruguay Round.<br />

<strong>China</strong>’s decision to re-integrate itself in the multilateral trading<br />

system constituted a fundamental element of its “Open Door” policy.<br />

It aimed at achieving a greater degree of re-integration in the world<br />

eco<strong>no</strong>my. This underlined the strategic shift of <strong>China</strong>’s eco<strong>no</strong>mic<br />

development thinking towards a more outward-looking approach.<br />

<strong>China</strong> recognized that its bilateral agreements with the major<br />

industrialized countries did <strong>no</strong>t provide <strong>China</strong> with full benefits of MFN<br />

treatment in its true sense. Its exports were subject to various kinds<br />

of discriminatory trade measures (e.g. discriminatory QRs, selective<br />

safeguard, and anti-dumping and countervailing actions on the basis of<br />

the so-called <strong>no</strong>n-market eco<strong>no</strong>my criteria).<br />

For domestic reasons, <strong>China</strong> needed the GATT/WTO membership<br />

to: 1) consolidated its eco<strong>no</strong>mic reform programmed; 2) made its “Open<br />

Door” policy irreversible; and 3) make its trade with other countries<br />

based upon multilaterally agreed rules and disciplines rather than rules<br />

unilaterally defined and imposed.<br />

<strong>China</strong>, as part of its accession commitments, has agreed to undertake<br />

some far-reaching obligations and commitments. 3 In addition, some<br />

residual discriminatory measures maintained against <strong>China</strong> by major<br />

trading partners are given general applicability, though they would<br />

be eliminated by specified dates. These far-reaching obligations and<br />

3 <strong>China</strong> made immense market-opening commitments in the areas of both goods and services:<br />

For industrial goods the average bound tariff level went down to 8.9 per cent, with a range from<br />

0 to 47 per cent, with the highest rates applied to photographic film and automobiles and related<br />

products. Some tariffs were eliminated and others reduced, mostly by 2004 but in <strong>no</strong> case later<br />

than 2010; after implementation of all the commitments made, <strong>China</strong>’s average bound tariff<br />

level decreased to 15 per cent for agricultural products. The range is from 0 to 65 per cent, with<br />

the higher rates applied to cereals; On Services, <strong>China</strong>’s commitments were more extensive<br />

than those of other developing countries; and <strong>China</strong> also committed to implement the TRIPs<br />

Agreement in full from date of accession.<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!