13.04.2013 Views

Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações ... - Funag

Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações ... - Funag

Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações ... - Funag

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the world and china in the next decade<br />

international structure as a basic variable, to analyze the deep impact the<br />

changing international structure has on global issues, decision-making<br />

systems, and the ideas of development.<br />

We can draw a distinct perspective into the current and future<br />

international structures from the split of Western and <strong>no</strong>n-Western<br />

powers in international relations. After the end of the Cold War, the<br />

world temporarily entered a uni-polar moment defined by American<br />

supremacy 2 . Becoming the formulator of global rules and the leading<br />

provider of international public goods, the US-led Western camp<br />

took full advantage in East-West relations and North-South relations.<br />

Nevertheless, the post-Cold War Western-centric position was quickly<br />

shaken in only two decades. By <strong>no</strong>w, the international authority and<br />

global influence of the Western camp has shrunk considerably. Being<br />

the leading force of Western primacy, the power of US is severely<br />

weakened for its foreign policy blunders and internal eco<strong>no</strong>mic<br />

difficulties 3 . In contrast, the <strong>no</strong>n-Western world is relatively divided<br />

and weak. Marginalized in the world power structure, <strong>no</strong>n-Western<br />

countries are deprived of the rights to make decisions and distribute<br />

benefits, and constantly suffer from interference and extrusion by the<br />

West. To be more specific, the <strong>no</strong>n-Western world includes emerging<br />

market eco<strong>no</strong>mies, Russia, the Islamic world, failed states, and anti-<br />

American countries. The status and role of countries or country blocs<br />

in the first three groups are of paramount importance in international<br />

structure. Against the great post-Cold War background of the expansion<br />

of globalization and the spread of tech<strong>no</strong>logical revolution, the <strong>no</strong>n-<br />

Western world has successfully initiated or accelerated the process of<br />

reform and modernization. Nonetheless, because of sharp differences<br />

in historical heritage, natural resources, and political abilities, <strong>no</strong>n-<br />

Western countries or country blocs have achieved different end results<br />

2 See Charles Krauthammer, “The Unipolar Moment”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, N o 1,1990/1991;<br />

Stephen G. Brooks and William C. Wohlforth, “American Primacy in Perspective”, Foreign<br />

Affairs, Vol. 81, N o 4, Jul./Aug., 2002; William C. Wohlforth, “The Stability of a Unipolar World”,<br />

International Security, Vol. 24, N o 1, Summer, 1999.<br />

3 For example, Prof. Yuan Peng holds that the international financial crisis this time is far<br />

from an eco<strong>no</strong>mic problem in the common sense, but a structural problem closely related to<br />

the foundation of American supremacy. Although US eco<strong>no</strong>my will continue to lead the world<br />

in the foreseeable future, but its eco<strong>no</strong>mic supremacy has already been structurally weakened.<br />

See Yuan Peng, “Financial Crisis and US Eco<strong>no</strong>mic Supremacy: Perspectives from History and<br />

Politics”, Contemporary International Relations. N o 5, 2009.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!