06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<br />

Decomposing lexical aspect:<br />

Telicity, the particle-verb construction and secondary predication<br />

Having outlined a rather involved set of case-marking relations in the BNBV inal<br />

construction at the end of chapter 1—the transfer of possession from a raised locative-<br />

terminative source to a goal in the ergative case—this chapter seeks to clarify several<br />

nagging issues that have to do with lexical aspect and whether or not aspectual properties<br />

interact with this curious case-marking regime in any palpable way. I argue that, in fact,<br />

the BNBV inal construction provides a useful diagnostic class for resolving a number of<br />

outstanding problems in previous explanations of the lexical aspectual system in<br />

Sumerian, notably Yoshikawa’s proposal that the introduction of ßu “hand” into an<br />

otherwise atelic predicate (forming, in many cases, a BNBV inal construction) converts it<br />

into a telic predicate. But prior to turning to Yoshikawa’s proposal, several preliminary<br />

steps are necessary: in section 2.1, a number of basic theoretical tools such as the<br />

opposition between lexical and grammatical aspect, the Vendlerian classification of<br />

lexical aspectual categories and the opposition between depictive and resultative<br />

secondary predication are introduced; in section 2.2, an analogy is drawn between<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!