06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

perception (“he saw that . . .”) and an indefinite relative that has, subsequently, been<br />

made definite (“he is the one who saw . . .”). In line 139, if we can base ourselves on the<br />

opposition between direct, bi 2.in.du 11, and indirect speech, im.mi.in.du 11, we might<br />

expect a form such as igi im.mi.in.du 8. But the fact that the statement is a rhetorical<br />

question that expects a negative answer, may have led the copyists to draw an analogy<br />

with a negated verb of perception such as igi nu mu.ni.du 8.am 3 (Gilgamesh and the<br />

Netherworld 302), which closely mirrors the form of the verb in several witnesses. All of<br />

these factors would seem to indicate that igi mi.ni.in.du 8.a is simply ungrammatical, the<br />

result of either phonological or grammatical misprision.<br />

(34) Dumuzi and Geshtinana [1.4.1.1], lines 52-55 (Sladek 1974, 229, 234-235; Wilcke<br />

1969b, 86)<br />

52. ßu.œar sa 6.ga nu.tuku.me.eß sa 6.ga Demons are never kind, they do not know<br />

˙ul nu.zu.me.eß good from evil,<br />

53. lu 2.u 3 e 2.nu ni 2.te.na zi.ni Who has ever seen a man, without a family,<br />

silim.ma 32 a.ba.a igi mi.ni.in.du 8<br />

233<br />

all alone, escape with his life?<br />

54. ki ku.li.bi nu.um.ßi.du ! .de 3.en ki We shall go neither to the dwelling of his<br />

mi 2.us 2.sa 2.bi nu.um.ßi.du.de 3.en friend nor his in-laws,<br />

32 The syntax of this line is quite interesting: the topic of the line, zi.ni, “his life,” forms the final component of the<br />

anticipatory genitive construction ni 2.te.na zi.ni. The reflexive pronoun /niten/ then acts as a pivot for and is<br />

coreferential with the clause initial lu 2.u 3, which acts as the subject of the initial phrase, lu 2.u 3 e 2 nu, “a man without a<br />

house, lit. the man, to/for whom there is no house.” The topical phrase, zi.ni, is the subject of silim.ma, “that it (= zi.ni)<br />

is well/whole,” and the adjectival predicate followed by the complementizer *-a, silim.ma, then serves as the<br />

“complement” of mi.ni.in.du 8. If my suggestion as to the derivation of *mini-√ from *bi-ni-√ is true, it may even be<br />

possible to interpret mi.ni.in.du8 as the head of an anticipatory genitive: “Of a man without …, who is his perceiver<br />

([*igi bi 2.in.du 8]-ni),” but the matter clearly requires further study.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!